As we approach the @federalreserve’s monetary policy conference at #JacksonHole this week, a question we’ve been asking ourselves is whether the abundance of survey-based, and goods-oriented, #economic data may be overstating the weakness in the #economy as a whole?
Without question, many broad-based surveys, including those focused on #ConsumerConfidence and small #business optimism, are painting a very bleak picture of the #economic trajectory.
And at the same time, many goods/manufacturing sector data points are portending continued significant weakening of the sector.
Yet, when we look at the #services sector, which is roughly 70% of consumption and about 50% of aggregate #GDP in the U.S., we see that portion of the #economy not only appears to be more resilient, but there are fewer high-frequency data points on which to draw conclusions.
In our view, part of what we’re witnessing here is a recalibration (normalization) of the #economy toward longstanding pre-Covid trends, in which goods #spending moderates and #services spending (much greater than goods) recaptures trend.
So, despite the very negative picture coming from the survey/goods diffusion data, some of the information we’re seeing from #CorporateEarnings data depicts a healthy #consumer overall…
…and also reinforces the shift in #spending from goods to services, which may be sustained, especially if gas (and other) #prices moderate further.
Furthermore, doesn’t this persistent service-sector recovery help explain why the #LaborMarkets continue to remain strong, and in fact are running at the highest rate of job gains in greater than 20 years? Will strong job growth persist next Friday?
What are the implications for Fed Jackson Hole commentary and the September #FOMC meeting?
As my colleague Bob Miller has argued, we think #ChairPowell could signal a wider aperture in the Committee’s reaction function, since staking out some conditionality going forward seems sensible to us given the unprecedented nature of this particular cycle.
And while data dependency continues to be the key watchword, the #FOMC is likely to hike the #Fed funds policy rate by 75 basis points in September (for the third time in a row)…
…to bring the policy rate range to between 3.0% and 3.25%, which should be seen as the beginning of moderately #restrictive levels.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In his @federalreserve#JacksonHole speech #ChairPowell stated emphatically that the #FOMC’s “overarching focus right now is to bring inflation back down to our 2 percent goal. Price stability is the responsibility of the Federal Reserve and serves as the bedrock of our economy.”
In other words, we take his statement today to mean that the #Fed won’t be easily swayed into reversing rate #hikes next year, and will stay with the elevated Funds rate for a long time.
The #Fed has clearly been (appropriately) rushing to get to a destination of #inflation-denting restrictive rate (and #liquidity) policy in order to break extremely high levels of inflation, while hopefully not thrusting the economy into a deep #recession.
The headline #inflation data today moderated a bit on the back of falling #gasoline prices, but it’s still running at a worryingly high rate.
Over time, we think the slowdown in #economic growth, the continuation of the @federalreserve’s assertive #HikingCycle and the possibility of resolution with several persistent supply chain issues should influence broad #inflation lower.
Still, while #CorePCE inflation (the #Fed’s favored measure) is likely to moderate in the coming months, it’ll still remain well-above the Fed’s 2% #inflation target.
The #JobsReport came in at 372,000 jobs gained, the #unemployment rate at 3.6%, which was coupled with #wage growth of 5.1% year-over-year: all solid numbers in a historic context.
Still, when taken in the context of much of the #economic data coming in, last week’s #employment report reemphasized two key tenets of the economy and consequently of #investment markets: 1) the U.S., and indeed the global economy, is tangibly slowing…
…and 2) we are probably past the #employment peak and will likely witness #LaborMarket slowing in the back half of the year.
The @federalreserve’s Federal Open Market Committee raised the target range for the Federal Funds #policy rate by 0.75% yesterday, to between 1.50% and 1.75%, as was increasingly anticipated.
The move by the #Fed to progress faster to neutral will be applauded in the long run by the #economy, business decision-makers and ultimately by# markets.
Like putting your car’s transmission (automatic or manual) into #neutral, getting to that place allows for decision-making flexibility given changing road conditions, particularly when the road to the #destination has become increasingly #murky.
Core #CPI (excluding those volatile #food and #energy components) came in at 0.6% month-over-month and rose 6.0% year-over-year.
Meanwhile, headline #CPI data printed at a very strong 1.0% month-over-month and came in at 8.6% year-over-year, spiking higher on #shelter, #gas and food costs.
These persistently outsized gains in #inflation are clearly having an impact on business and #ConsumerConfidence. Also, the #Fed’s favored measure of inflation, core #PCE, increased 0.34% in April, bringing the year-over-year figure for the measure to 4.9%, as of that month.
As was widely expected, the @federalreserve’s Federal Open Market Committee raised the target range for the Federal Funds #policy rate by 50 basis points (bps), to between 0.75% and 1.0%, and announced the start of #runoff of the central bank’s balance sheet.
As previously suggested by the #Fed’s March minutes, the pace of runoff was confirmed today as $95 billion/month ($60 billion in U.S. #Treasuries and $35 billion in Agency #MBS, with a three-month phase-in period.
Also as expected, the statement reiterated that the #FOMC “anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate,” underscoring the seriousness of #Fed policymakers in getting #inflation and inflation expectations under control.