βοΈ Facilitate communication interoperability across financial institutions, market infrastructures, and end-user groups.
. . .
[5/24] β 2β£ What's the big deal? β
. . .
βοΈ The potential solution w/ #ISO20022 is to create a uniform standardization method that all financial standards organizations would follow.
π€ As an illustration, consider the unification of all languages into a single standard: English
[6/24] β 3β£ What's the big deal? β
[7/24] β 1β£ Details regarding the transformation β
π Converts incoming #MX messages to corresponding old #MT forms, as well as outgoing MT messages to equivalent MX formats, and enables needed #reporting and confirmation messages.
π Achieves smoother #CBPR+ adoption by allowing financial institutions to migrate a subset of CBPR+ messages using an ad-hoc #translator and other messages using native CBPR+/#ISO 20022 implementation.
[16/24] β 4β£ Migration Approaches β
πΉ Centralized Payments Hub Orchestrator
π Operates as a #bridge between the financial institution's back-end systems and the #SWIFT network, and supports all other techniques as well as new additional functionalities
The closest thing we have to anything that might be utilized in conjunction with #ISO20022's rich data fields is the ISO/AWI 24165-1 Digital token identifier standard.
[1/π§΅] A paradigm shift for the XRP Ledger is on the horizon βΌοΈ
It's a future that's:
πΈ Programmable
πΈ Automated
πΈ Compliance-first
Let's take a look at some of the fundamental arguments and work out what this will mean for XRP. π
[2/18] β 1β£ Status Quo β
To date, the XRPL is a so-called βfixed-functionβ blockchain, which only allows new native features to be added to the XRP Ledger if the on-chain governance process votes in favor of it.
If you're a pessimist, you would call this βpermissionedβ. π
[3/18] β 2β£ Status Quo β
But there are actually many benefits and advantages that support this approach, e.g.:
πΈ Battle-tested (i.e. Escrow, Paychannel)
πΈ Aggregated Liquidity (CLOB+AMM)
πΈ Automatic Version Upgrades
πΈ Higher Standards (More Audits and Performance Tests)
[1/π§΅] One of the more fundamental proposals became public today. It's a draft that lays out a path to an inheritance solution for the XRP Ledger. π§
In my view, this is so much more than βjustβ an inheritance solution.
[1/π§΅] There are people out there who still believe that there are ways to clawback XRP on the XRPL. π€¨
While this is NOT possible & is written all over the official documentation, there is one more argument that should hit the nail on the coffin.
The ULTIMATE reason why π
[2/14] β Tokens β
Whenever you hear βclawbackβ, you should automatically think of βissued assetsβ.
They are fungible and come in many forms and structures:
πΈ IOUs
πΈ Stablecoins
πΈ Multi-Purpose (later this year)
Anyone can issue these kinds of tokens on the XRP Ledger.
[3/14] β Structure β
On the XRPL, all currently issued token holdings exist via so-called βtrust linesβ, i.e. an accounting relationship between a person holding a token & the issuer.
In other words, something to prevent you from holding a token that you don't want.