Profile picture
⚡️Kathy E Gill @kegill
, 11 tweets, 6 min read Read on Twitter
A few comments about this Jan 17 CNN report on the Nassar sentencing hearing, surfaced in a Jan 24 tweet by @germanrlopez
@Mantzarlis
cnn.com/2018/01/17/us/… #
1st: Non-sourced judgmental statements litter the article, eg > "Aquilina's comments have sometimes bordered on vindictive."
“Sometimes” is plural
Judge Aquilina’s eye-for-an-eye slip happened once
Hence my classification of this statement as editorial. #
2nd: CNN cites three "experts.” I have read stories with experts who say the exact opposite, that it is not unusual for judges to express opinion in sentencing hearings. Here’s NYT
nytimes.com/2018/01/23/spo… #
3rd:
Judge Aquilina was carrying out Michigan law regarding integrating victim statements into sentencing. The two lawyers CNN quoted are not certified to practice law in MI. #
4th: Judge Aquilina comments in sentencing were not tepid. Guess what. The Michigan Court of Appeals has already ruled that they don’t need to be. THIS WAS NOT A TRIAL.

#
5th: Victim statements are permitted at some point of the sentencing process in all 50 states, BTW. And #timesUp for judges who don’t honor this for sexual assault
time.com/5121265/judge-…

h/t for ^ tweet > Bustle
bustle.com/p/judge-rosema…
#
6th: Judge Aquilina did something that no one else in the system seems to have done: listened to these young women and believed them. This is not the norm for sexual assault cases. For that alone she should be lauded.
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/… #
7th: As the @WashingtonPost notes, her forum provided advocacy for justice for victims of sexual assault - something sorely missing in the United States
washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-par…
8th: The comment that @germanrlopez and @Mantzarlis take issue with was prefaced with "Our Constitution does not allow for cruel and unusual punishment ... If it did, I might.." IMO, this was a slip made while speaking directly to a victim. #
9th: Yes, I'd preferred she had not said this. But it is the only one of her personal responses to 156 victims (0.75%) that has been criticized. As Slate notes, she is human:
slate.com/news-and-polit… #
10th: Therefore, stating, as the original tweet does, that Judge Aquilina deserves NO praise/endorsement due to one slip is the new dictionary entry for gotcha-journalism.

#
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to ⚡️Kathy E Gill
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert is as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!