This is the final part: How the GOP went from a Conservative Party to an Authoritarian Party (1994-2016)
Part I begins here:
Conservatives are adverse to change (rapid change CAN be destabilizing).
Right Wing Authoritarians (RWAs) are adverse to complexity (this includes diversity).
They value discipline and order.
Non-authoritarians value curiosity, openness and are less threatened by uncertainty.
By the 1980s (remember) the GOP coalition consisted of conservatives, libertarians, and RWA groups (NRA, KKK, neo-Nazis, etc.)
After Nixon’s downfall, it was clear to the far right wing that they needed a media of their own. With that, they understood Nixon would have survived.
Gingrich moved the GOP closer to authoritarianism in 1994 when he said the GOP was the party of “discipline” (authoritarian) and the Democrats the party of “therapy."
When Bannon wants to wreck the “establishment” he wants to spread…
Putin said democracy is “messy” and it is. Democracy requires compromise; dictatorship doesn’t.
When the Tea Party & Ted Cruz railed against compromise, they moved the GOP closer still toward authoritarianism.
Now that the GOP is authoritarian, it is “us v. them.”
Both sides believe they’re fighting for the “real” America.
"What?" you say. "How is Trump's vision the 'real' America?"
Because 33% of the population is RWA, authoritarianism has always been with us. (They're good at seizing power, so they often have greater power than their numbers.)
We’ve been fighting the same fight since the drafting of the Constitution.
Liberalism has always won out.
So hang in there everyone. If we do what we need to, liberalism will win again.
Studies show that about 1/3 of the people are INCLINED toward authoritarianism and have a tendency to fall in line behind a certain kind of leader. They are susceptible to certain fears.
Some of the studies outlined here:
researchgate.net/publication/31…