Humble advice from someone who got destroyed again and again by the market in his 8 years of quantitative trading career:
Charts that show that a model has successfully predicted past 3 bubbles are *not* rigorous statistical evidence.
medium.com/@QwQiao/nvt-an…
And even then I don't think my analysis is rigorous enough for NVT to be used. It's merely a pointer for future research.
As a matter of fact, my own blog post on NVT suffers from this problem.
It takes years of data science experience to appreciate the statement "complexity is a form of laziness".
It takes years of experience to appreciate the statement "best regularization method is domain knowledge".