"If he hadn't broken the law, police wouldn't have shot him"
"If they hadn't broken the law, the US government wouldn't have stolen their children"
"Sure the President broke the law but what's the big deal really"
"If they hadn't broken the law, the US government wouldn't have stolen their children"
"Sure the President broke the law but what's the big deal really"
Only certain crimes count. And the dividing line isn't, say, violent/not. It's *the kind of person* (race, wealth) who commits it. And as "criminals," they deserve whatever happens to them--even trauma, death. Other kinds of criminals? "Criminals?!" The mere accusation is unfair
The unindicted co-conspirator stage is a logical, even easy time to say "look, I support Trump, but no one is above the law." But a swath of people WANT him to be above the law. And not just because they want him to stay President. Because THEY want to be above the law, too.
The first 2 members of Congress to endorse Trump share his entitlement and disregard for the law. The 3rd, Jeff Sessions, advances white supremacist policies. As some Trump allies face accountability for the former, we must insist it for the latter.
The US gov't stole thousands of children from their parents and has yet to reunite more than 500 of them. Many of the parents were *tricked* into giving up their kids. Reupping this thread about who gets punished in the US
