Profile picture
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner
, 4 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
The 11th Circuit is NOT happy that Supreme Court precedent meant it had to affirm a district court injunction against an Alabama law "effectively eliminat[ing]" access to D&E abortions. (h/t @gabrielmalor) media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f…
From the majority opinion:
Here is the senior appeals court judge concurring fully: "I am not on the Supreme Court"
And, here is the poor district court judge sitting by designation on the case:
(I am now of the opinion that this was not so much an attempt to stay out of the fray as it was the judicial equivalent of "Bless their hearts.")
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Chris Geidner
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!