After introducing the case on page 2 we find this, much like what I quoted above.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dmd_5ePU4AAEVBk.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeGCS7V4AAIyPN.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeHDfWU4AE2eay.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeHsVbU4AAObXs.jpg)
And so concludes on pg 72.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeJFxhUYAAnXjs.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeJvHzU4AEb85x.jpg)
But I'm not done with you yet. Because you made another entirely bogus, out-of-thin-air claim.
It takes but moments to find their financials. Seconds to find it in a nice graphic form, to be instantly understood.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DmeMeKsUcAAfGT6.jpg)
Twitter financials here:
investor.twitterinc.com/financial-info…
Knight v Trump ruling:
evernote.com/l/AA-wr-dlOodK…