While we know people can change, K's story is that he was a quiet, bible-studying, studious, virgin.
For K to be " virgin", we have to believe that...
a) he attended NONE of the parties, events, activities of the frat
2/
c) attended, watched, but never aided women being assaulted
3/
4/
And, if c) --> we'd expect to hear repentance. Along the lines of...
5/
I no longer associate with any of my frat brothers...
6/
7/
... since that time, I no longer associate with any of those frat, people of clearly loose moral character...
8/
... No epiphanies or turning-point...
...no indication of how he has changed since then...
9/
...can "turn-around" and become a non-alcoholic, non-drinking, non-criminal adult...
11/
But we don't see this.
Instead, he maintains long-term friendships with old friends who definitely committed criminal acts (Judge +)...
... And clearly revels in the activities of a clearly misspent youth
12/
- Profound change
- Lying
If you choose the highly unlikely "option 3" - where he joined a frat, participated in none of its criminal activities or events over 4 years, saw nothing, reported nothing, remained a virgin...
13/
- Highly unobservant
- Has an extremely low moral code (knew crimes were being committed, did nothing)
- Extremely open to blackmail
And now the mysterious way his considerable debts were paid off becomes highly relevant - who does he "owe"?
14/
How MANY women did he assault?
15/
Do you really trust his judgement now? Especially bc he shows NO REMORSE for being that drunk, or for hanging out with those kinds of ppl - for that long (8 years)???
16/
Investigation of those 8 years.
I think the burden is on Brett to prove he committed no crimes, and never had sex, given the places he was, and the company he kept.
17/
Then we know Brett is a flat out, on record, liar.
I'd say the odds, and predictable human behavior...
Just aren't on Brett's side.
/end