Sexual history, bank accounts, and political affiliations of all 3 accusers warrant checking.
What woman waits 35 years before reporting a rape (to the news and a political party member) with no contemporaneous corroborative evidence.
Rumour (esp decades later) is not evidence
What woman waits 35 years before reporting a rape (to the news and a political party member) with no contemporaneous corroborative evidence.
Rumour (esp decades later) is not evidence
🐘Did the alleged rape victims keep going to the parties and keep hanging out with the same crowd?
🐘How many men did these women have sex with, especially in their youth?
🐘Have either of these women been paid anything for these allegations?
🐘Who is paying their lawyers?
🐘How many men did these women have sex with, especially in their youth?
🐘Have either of these women been paid anything for these allegations?
🐘Who is paying their lawyers?
🐘What are the political affiliations of these women?
🐘What is their relationship with any Democracy Alliance Clintonite groups?
🐘Do the DNC, Dirty Politics/Dirty PR strategists, think they can do a Dodgy Dossier equivalent to character assassinate Kavanaugh?
🐘What is their relationship with any Democracy Alliance Clintonite groups?
🐘Do the DNC, Dirty Politics/Dirty PR strategists, think they can do a Dodgy Dossier equivalent to character assassinate Kavanaugh?
Every man (esp politicians and officials) is at risk of losing his reputation, career & future - if a woman (with a likely malicious agenda) can accuse him of sexual abuse decades earlier - without any contemporaneous evidence.
The accused is innocent unless “proven” guilty
The accused is innocent unless “proven” guilty
