,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
"We believe [Exxon etc] were lulled into complacency by a series of lucky near-misses." Chilling story. Read it now, and think about all the spikes you ignore and move past with no understanding. hbr.org/2011/04/how-to…
I want there to be, like, a taxonomy of suspiciousnesses and how likely they are to metastasize.
- binary crashes once in a while? score, 2
- many binaries begin crashing around the same time, with no discernible pattern or proximate cause? 7
- ^ it's a fatal crash loop: 9.5
- binary crashes once in a while? score, 2
- many binaries begin crashing around the same time, with no discernible pattern or proximate cause? 7
- ^ it's a fatal crash loop: 9.5
Btw, it is good hygiene for systems if you occasionally pick a weird shape on a dashboard, bite down,, and *do not let go* until you understand that fucking graph.
The longer it takes, the more desperately it's needed. (Or the more desperately you need honeycomb, heh)
The longer it takes, the more desperately it's needed. (Or the more desperately you need honeycomb, heh)
