,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
This is wrong in so many ways. I'll give you the simplest example: say that the case for impeachment against Donald Trump involves the description of bad acts (but not criminal acts) by *people other than Trump*, which it *most certainly does*. How could DOJ withhold *that* info?
1/ The way we're discussing how to prove a crime/impeachment is farcical. The idea Barr could put Trump above the law by refusing to release any info on him because he can't be indicted as POTUS is insane. The same is true for not releasing supporting info involving other people.
2/ Imagine that Barr agrees, for instance, to send all the investigative info on Trump to Congress for possible impeachment proceedings—but *blacks out all other names* in the same way the Manafort filing blacked out all non-Manafort/non-Gates/non-Kilimnik names. See the problem?
