Thread by @usacsmret

patriotpost.us/alexander/6259…

Democrats often repeat the mantra that they are doing “the work of the American people.” But all they have to offer is their vitriolic “Hate Trump” platform that feeds the anger and fear of their increasingly deranged constituents.

Donald Trump has genuinely endeavored to make America a better country for all of its citizens — and in many respects has accomplished that despite that Democrats’ best efforts to obstruct that agenda.

But Democrats have spent the last two years using their “Russia collusion” subterfuge to undermine progress for all Americans — because that progress threatens their power. They will spend the next two years doing the same thing.

To that end, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, along with her House tag team of Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler and Intel Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, are desperate to keep their collusion/obstruction narrative alive.

The purpose for setting up this two-year sham investigation served no other purpose than to obstruct Trump’s political agenda and potentially even find grounds for his removal from office. Arguably, this was the most dangerous and disgraceful episode in American political history

As Barr noted, “The White House fully cooperated with the special counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely

The president took no act that deprived special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.…Mueller’s evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.”

Barr’s summary also concluded that Trump, “in the interest of transparency and full disclosure,” did not assert executive privilege to withhold information from Mueller, although it would’ve been well within his rights to do so.

The report completely debunks the veracity of the Trump-Russia dossier, which was the premise for this entire Democrat-concocted enterprise.
The report also deflates several extraordinary claims promoted by the Demo/Leftmedia propaganda machine

Among those would be: Carter Page, whose supposed Russian connection was the basis for the FISA warrant, which was the basis for the investigation, should never have been targeted;

Trump never directed his lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress; Cohen did not travel to Prague; Cohen’s conversation with a Russian had nothing to do with collusion;

Trump’s interim campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was not providing polling data to Vladimir Putin; Trump did not encourage Republicans to soften their position on Ukraine; and, as it turns out, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not a Russian agent.

But the report raised serious questions by virtue of omission.
The most significant failure of the report is that it did not evaluate the predicates for the investigation.

As Barr noted in his recent congressional testimony, “I think spying [on the Trump campaign] did occur.” He continued, “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. Spying on a political campaign is a big deal.”

Former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova added: The report itself makes it clearer than ever what any unbiased observer of the Russia story has been able to see for more than a year: Robert Mueller knew very early on in his investigation that there was no collusion.”

Political analyst Kimberley Strassel concludes in The Wall Street Journal: “President Trump has every right to feel liberated. What the report shows is that he endured a special-counsel probe that was relentlessly, at times farcically, obsessed with taking him out.

What stands out is just how diligently and creatively the special counsel’s legal minds worked to implicate someone in Trump World on something Russia- or obstruction-of-justice-related. And how — even with all its overweening power and aggressive tactics — it still struck out.”

Regarding the report’s controversial “Ten Episodes” of possible obstruction, these events are readily dismissible as the actions of a president frustrated by a phony DOJ investigation seeded by his political enemies and high-level government operatives as part of a coup d'etat

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley says, “Despite identifying 10 troubling episodes that could be defined as acts of obstruction, [Mueller] could not say with confidence that Trump acted with the requisite ‘corrupt intent.’ …

Even the best grounds for obstructive intent with Trump seeking to fire Mueller, an order ignored by White House Council, was justified by Trump as based on his fear of a conflict of interest.

Like indictable acts, impeachable acts demand a showing of intent, not simply an array of possible intense.”

Not content with the report’s failure to comport with the Democrats’ agenda, Rep. Adam “Shifty” Schiff has “invited” Mueller to testify before his Intel Committee.

But that testimony, if it happens, will provide ample openings for Republicans to ask important questions about the Obama administration hacks who should really be investigated for seeding this hoax.

All that said, one of the most significant findings of the Mueller Report is that, under Obama’s watch, the Russian government engaged in a “sweeping and systemic” campaign of interference through its government sponsored Internet Research Agency, and the GRU.

According to the report, it was the GRU that hacked the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the DNC, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, along with more than 300 Clinton campaign staffers and others associated with campaigns.

As they launch phase two of the coup, Democrats believe that the Mueller Report provides them a roadmap to impeachment.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) was the first Democrat on the crowded 2020 presidential stage to call for Trump’s impeachment. "...We have a Constitution of the United States. And it says, when a president engages in this kind of activity, then it’s time for impeachment.”

Of course, whenever a leftist mentions the word “Constitution,” we can be confident that whatever follows is complete horse pucky.
Sen. Harris also got on board: “I believe Congress should take the steps towards impeachment. I believe that we need to get rid of this president.”

Nancy Pelosi, “We have to save our democracy. This isn’t about Democrats or Republicans. It’s about saving our democracy. If it is what we need to do to honor our responsibility to the Constitution — if that’s the place the facts take us, that’s the place we have to go.”

Pelosi continued: “While our views range from proceeding to investigate the findings of the Mueller report or proceeding directly to impeachment, we all firmly agree that we should proceed down a path of finding the truth. …

This, of course, has nothing to do with the truth. The Mueller Report has (however one-sidedly) already documented the truth — which is that this entire affair was a Democrat ruse. But their “collective constituency of dunces” will likely not be able to discern that.

Responding brilliantly to this gaggle of Demo accusers, Trump asked, “How do you impeach a Republican President for a crime that was committed by the Democrats?”

Indeed, even CNN’s leftist anchor Wolf Blitzer concluded, “So there you have almost a complete vindication of the president of the United States.”

But Leftmedia outlets will continue to churn this hoax because, regardless of its merits, it comports with their political agenda and it sells advertising — it’s a big seller!

Meanwhile, Demos are lining up their next round of fodder to obstruct Trump’s agenda, turning their attention to his tax returns for diversion.
Footnote: I propose that the $35 million bill for Mueller’s investigation be invoiced to the DNC, or perhaps the Clinton crime syndicate