,
5 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
@MythicistMKE @AmericanAtheist @WEEDMONTON @aliamjadrizvi Absolutely. Singling out Harris and Dawkins as contributing factors to a terrorist attack in New Zealand is not only deranged, but dangerous and cowardly.
@MythicistMKE @AmericanAtheist @WEEDMONTON @aliamjadrizvi I'll no longer be supporting @AmericanAtheist (and will be telling others not to bother either) until they can clarify:
1. If it's necessary to openly criticise Islam
2. Whether Harris & Dawkins are anti-Muslim bigots.
1. If it's necessary to openly criticise Islam
2. Whether Harris & Dawkins are anti-Muslim bigots.
For context, @AmericanAtheist thought it was a good idea to share smear pieces accusing prominent public atheists of being partly responsible for the Christchurch attack. What they should have done is publicly defended them from these disgusting attacks. What are you even for?
Here's a clip of me talking about it in my podcast
@AmericanAtheist As an atheist activist organisation, it's not good enough to remain neutral when mainstream publications are smearing public atheists and blaming them for terrorism. It's not good enough to share dangerous hit-jobs under the guise of seeking diverse 'perspectives'.
