Thread by @soychicka

Clearly the GOP needs to be given a choice:

Start playing nice with the investigations into the Trump administration, or with all that time left, @OversightDems will have plenty of time to start investigating the rampant ties to sexual predators of children within the GOP.

And that includes a 9-year span of a serial sexual predator of children holding the top office in the house.

It's time to ask the questions that aren't very nice of EVERY SINGLE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE, under oath.

Yes, on both sides of the aisle.

Some questions:

a) after turning 19, have you ever had any form of sexual contact or communication with anyone under the age of 18?

b) Are you aware of any suspected incidents of inappropriate sexual behavior directed towards children that have not been prosecuted?

c) do you have knowledge of any adults who have engaged in sexual contact or communication with anyone under the age of 18 ?
if so, with whom have you discussed that information?
did you ensure it was reported to law enforcement?

d) do you suspect any adults who have engaged in sexual contact or communication with anyone under the age of 18 ? For what reason?

if so, with whom have you discussed that information? did you ensure it was reported to law enforcement?

e) has anyone ever approached you with information about any adults who have engaged in sexual contact or communication with anyone under the age of 18 ?

if so, with whom have you discussed that information? did you ensure it was reported to law enforcement?

f) are you aware of any females under the age of 18 years old who may have had terminated a pregnancy after sexual contact with anyone over the age of 19?

g) have you ever refused or hesitated to act on reports or suspicions of either sexual assault or child sexual assault?

>> obviously, there are more nuanced questions to follow a positive response to any of the above - names, dates may be provided in private... but the circumstances must be disclosed publicly.

Under oath.