My Authors
Read all threads
After some delicious lunch, we’re back at the #womeninmacro conference! Valerie Ramey from @UCSDEcon is next with her paper joint with @chrisnekarda from @federalreserve Board. Views do not represent the views of the System or other research staff members.

#WIMC19 1
@UCSDEcon @chrisnekarda @federalreserve For years, price markups were believed be me countercyclical, but some are procyclical. In New Keynesian models, price markups can be both countercyclical or procyclical, depending on the shocks.

Q: is behavior of price markups consistent with sticky-price NK models?

#WIMC19 2
The paper:
1) constructs a new measure of price markup
2) estimates the unconditional cyclicality of markups
3) analyzes the cyclicality of markups conditional on supply and demand shocks

#WIMC19 3
Model and price markup defs are standard.
Use of labor margin bc:
1) 0 or small adjustment costs on worker hours
2) labor inputs and wages paid are well-measured
3) lots of estimates on elasticities of substitution bween labor and capital
4) answer to critiques in paper
#WIMC19 4
Baseline measure based on Cobb-Douglas production fcn, labor share as total labor compensation divided by output, focusing on private business sector.

Estimates of price-cost margins and detrended price markups in graphs.

#WIMC19 5
First generalization of markup was to include overhead labor—> no attempt found to measure it. They estimate overhead labor in auto plants: ~11% of employment.

#WIMC19 6
Second generalization is moving from Cobb-Douglas to CES.

How to measure capital utilization? Three different versions:
1) constant utilization (at odds with standard NK)
2) Shapiro’s workweek of capital
3) Fernald’s utilization of capital and labor

#WIMC19 7
All different markup measures for CES

#WIMC19 8
Cobb-Douglas estimates and CES estimates.
The latter are all over: some measures tell us about procyclicality, some about countercyclicality.

#WIMC19 9
Now to the model!

We now look at the response of markup measures to 4 types of shocks:
1) monetary policy
2) government spending
3) TFP
4) investment-specific technology

Results in graphs below.

#WIMC19 10
Summary: Markup increases in response to the first 3 shocks, decreases to IST shocks. Results for 2 tech shocks consistent with NK models, but the results for demand shocks are not.

“Unconditional cyclicalities are not dispositive”

Linda Tesar from @UMich discusses

#WIMC19 11
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Elena Falcettoni

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!