Thread by @LeonBadWifi

telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/0…

Think about it, why did they keep this from the public for so long, happened in autumn 2015?

How bad would have that looked during negotiations for Iran deal which was literally finalized few months after events that occurred in article above? UK major proponent of deal? who was pushing hard to finalize?

Now, think about why they decided to release the information now... strange timing no? Here I'll construct a timeline of recent events this past week, something most people arent adding up...

{Trump UK visit: what coincidentally occured during his time in UK or shortly after}

1-> Christopher Steele went from no interview w/ DOJ, weeks before, to now "I'll interview with Durham w/ counsel." He doesnt want a subpoena to testify in US, he wants to stay safe in UK, he knows his dossier is bunk + was fraudulently used to get a warrant to spy on Americans.

2-> JA extradition request to US via UK: IMO Legal discovery in his case will expose DNC was not hacked by RU, which will prove what IA whistleblowers were saying, and disprove Crowdstrike claim. Remember it was Wikileaks that received the emails so JA knows who REALLY got them.

3-> Carter Page comes out saying he was C_A informant for at least a decade and doing it for FREE: Which adds to public documents proving he worked with them to take down RU agents, the IRONY. He was the guy that was spied on wrongfully based on bunk Steele dossier...

Contd: Same dossier that claimed he was colluding with RU, yet in the end was not charged by Mueller for ANY crime. Seriously @carterwpage deserves a major apology. What UK contact other than Steele also collaborated to take him down?

4-> .@JudicialWatch via FOIA lawsuit discovers the laundering of Steele dossier to State Dept. State Dept isn't an IA, its MO does not include vetting intelligence, he was laundering the dossier to the State Dept. so State Dept could leak it as a "trusted intelligence source."

IMO Steele laundered the dossier to State Dept + F_I,  because all needed someone who was previously a vetted foreign intelligence asset (ex-MI6 agent and ex informant to F_I) to "vet" what ever convenient lie through unofficial means to avoid official process of verification...

...to then leak to media to affect public policy that is being pushed by the client. (In the RU probe, it was Clinton paying FusionGPS who consulted Orbis to hire Steele to "create" dossier to be laundered to F_I, Ohr, SD to be used to get a FISA warrant + push fake narrative)

RU probe isn't the first time doing it I bet. It'll go deeper. All will affect UK-US relations. Going to make Watergate look like a joke, which is why we are finally seeing little leaks like the article above. What other fake "vetted" dossier was peddled to push an agenda?

i.e.  A dossier that would leave out crucial information like details of article above to justify Iran Deal? Jk, but maybe? ;)

***FORESHADOWING***
/end