, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
7th Cir. holds no 1st Amendt violation for a sentencing judge to take into consideration defendant's white supremacist ideas and hatred for the U.S. even though these were unrelated to his crime.

Holds these ideas were evidence of future dangerousness.
media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExe…
Although, the opinion doesn't claim to rely on it, the court nods toward the "magic incantations" standard of constitutional review.
It seems to me incanting "I'm totally not doing what it looks like I'm doing" wouldn't work for anyone else. Don't think it should work for district courts either.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Gabriel Malor
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!