,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
If you’re in an enclosed room with 100 people, a mass shooting starts, a person carrying draws a gun (directing fire his way & giving people time to escape), he kills the gunman.
Do Democrats see that person as a hero saving a 100 lives or a gun nut?
Do they prefer him gunless?
Do Democrats see that person as a hero saving a 100 lives or a gun nut?
Do they prefer him gunless?
If you’re telling me you’d prefer the person who’s carrying in this scenario gunless then you’re telling me you’d prefer 100 people lifeless because bad people will always find a way to get a gun. Responsible gun owners can be a first line of defense when waiting for police.
How are nearly all mass shootings stopped:
A) A gun law
B) A gun
A gun stops it. A gun can be wielded for good or for evil. Doing away with guns won’t do away with evil. As long as evil and 400 million guns exist in the US, good people need to be able to defend themselves.
A) A gun law
B) A gun
A gun stops it. A gun can be wielded for good or for evil. Doing away with guns won’t do away with evil. As long as evil and 400 million guns exist in the US, good people need to be able to defend themselves.
