,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
During the 2016 presidential campaign, especially when it became obvious that the YOUNGEST of the four nominees was 63, and the two major party nominees, Donald Trump and HRC, were 70 and 69, respectively, I said that there needed to be an age LIMIT on the presidency.
That's even more obvious now, given that the current top three in the Democratic race will all be at least 71 at the time of the election running against a 74-year old incumbent. (Democratic front-runner Joe Biden will be 78 just after the election and Bernie Sanders will be 79.)
But that opinion regarding an age LIMIT on the presidency coming from someone like me is one thing. When that opinion comes from Jimmy Carter, who actually held the office for four years and campaigned twice ('76 & '80), is something entirely different.
cnn.com/2019/09/18/opi…
cnn.com/2019/09/18/opi…
