The transcript is here: cnn.com/2019/09/25/pol…
The call offers a close-up look at how Trump operates and conducts foreign policy as President of the United States.
It’s also clear why the much of the Fox-GOP will excuse the behavior.
Quotes from: politico.com/f/?id=00000169…
Trump doesn’t order anyone to lie or commit crimes. He’s more subtle.
Other times Trump would look Cohen in the eye and say that he had “no business in Russia."
Trump's would then . . .
In his way,” Cohen explained, “he was telling me to lie.”
Cohen understood that, “no business in Russia,” was the lie he was supposed to tell.
Andrew McCabe tells a similar story. . .
Trump offered a “gleeful” description of what happened with the firing of Comey.
None of it was true.
McCabe understood that he was supposed to “adopt” the lie Trump was telling him.
time.com/5531604/andrew…
Later, when McCabe refused, Trump attacked him with stunning venom and vengeance.
If Trump made no outward threat, why did Cohen do Trump’s bidding?
Was he scared?
Nope.
“Being around Mr. Trump was intoxicating. . .
politico.com/f/?id=00000169…
Trump pulls people in.
He dangles wealth and power.
These tactics have a special appeal to the GOP.
See this history of the GOP:
They don't care HOW Trump wins. . .
The tactics described by Michael Cohen were on full display in Trump’s phone call with Ukranian President Zelensky. cnn.com/2019/09/25/pol…
After Zelensky said he wanted to buy javelins from the U.S. . .
He went on to say, “I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it.”
Trump then told a lie: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, and that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. . .
Next Trump told an even more blatant lie. He said, “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it . . it sounds horrible to me.”
Okay, so, what the heck happened in that phone call?
For this analysis, let’s limit ourselves to the actual phone call.
We'll look at the call by itself.
Trump wanted the Ukrainian government to investigate Joe Biden.
He also wanted them to reach a certain conclusion.
In fact, if we limit ourselves to the text of the phone call, there was no crime.
For something to be a crime, it must violate a particular criminal statute.
Trump wanted Zelensky to order an investigation of Biden, Trump's political opponent. Obviously, this would help Trump get elected in 2020.
In turn, Trump would help Zelensky. . .
Anyone who read The Godfather knows that this is how it’s done. There are no direct threats. The Godfather makes people want to serve him.
The Godfather is careful.
What, exactly, was Trump doing?
He wasn’t merely asking a foreign government to manufacture evidence against his political opponent.
He was weaponizing the U.S. A.G. and the U.S. Justice Department to carry this out.
He is spinning mafia-like webs to secure his own power.
Watch closely to see which members of the GOP are okay with that.
I'll explain. Proving quid pro quo is a bit more complicated. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18………
Supreme Court rulings have made bribery extraordinarily . . .
There is a lot of gray area.
If you give a politician money, and then say, "But I have a favor to ask . . . " this isn't considered bribery, even if the politician eventually does what you wanted.
Trump wants people to think that to be impeachable, an act has to be a crime.
Trump kept saying "no collusion" because he knew that when his behavior . . .
There's a reason the GOP talking points are "No Quid Pro Quo."
They want the argument to be over whether Trump committed the crime of bribery.
When it turns out . . .
Let's learn from our "NO COLLUSION" mistakes
Don't walk into the "NO QUID PRO QUO" trap.
Okay?
Not everything dangerous or immoral is a crime. Behavior is a crime only if it violates a particular criminal statute.
Some things are not crimes but if the president does it, it's dangerous. . .
But if the US President is secretly propped up by Russian money, the safety and security of the US is compromised.
And another good reason to stay away from the "YES quid pro quo" response.
Let's talk about what's actually going on instead of trying to shoehorn it into a statutory crime.
terikanefield-blog.com/dont-walk-into…
It's also about Trump's tactics and how he operates.