His "persuasive pitch" was that automation will make 1 in 3 jobs obsolete by 2030.
This is utter horse sh*t.
I'll give you one example why, and you can extrapolate that out to other scenarios.
Here goes:
INFINITE other job possibilities exist, but transactional friction + a lack of systems to support them make them appear to be non-viable relative to the jobs we "see" now.
You own a property. It's got scads of problems that need repairs/fixing. Your landscaping is a damn mess.
Right now, you don't wanna hire some rando to do this stuff for a million reasons—trust, consistency, appearance of a "real business," etc.
Most properties are dumps.
But every property could be a paradise given the right input and elbow grease.
"Retrofixing" all properties in the US would create an untold number of jobs—jobs that literally don't exist right now.
Nature is the GOAT of external pressure.
Governments and regulations are another example.
A b*tchy wife is yet another example.
One such problem? Properties are dumps. Let's make them paradises.
Thank to automation, you will pay less for some things and have more money for others.
There's no such thing as "killing" jobs.
There are simply different pressures and incentive structures that yield different possibilities and outcomes.