, 11 tweets, 5 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
The unsurprising case of @GaSecofState's effort to intimidate me and other witnesses to the embarrassing failures of the new voting system--follow this thread.

Background: Professor @rad_atl, @rjomartin and I observed polls on Election Day in two pilot counties for BMDs. 1/
2/ Several volunteer observers spent weeks of early voting documenting the problems with the new system, so we knew what to look for. We acted as public observers. No credentials are required per GA law.

SOS staff saw us observing and documenting and initiated a complaint.
3/ Here is a copy of the complaint summary the SOS initiated for Watson Center in Dallas. Note the "complainant" is the SOS.
…altionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/d-s3031b092207…
4/ Before the complaint summary was released Ben Nadler at @AP was able to get some info from SOS that they wouldn't give us or @CoalitionGoodGv attorney. apnews.com/0b70d4b1edb646…
5/ But the SOS obviously feed @stphnfwlr a list of fabricated allegations against us claiming such nonsense as being inside voting booths (!), taking pictures, and not being "registered" to be observing the polls. See his nonsense regurgitation of SOS b.s.
6/ The "picture" they alleged that I took is one I found on-line of a voter testing the machine at a demo, with a just-for-fun ballot. I was showing that screen size causes loss of ballot secrecy. [Guess @GaSecofState didn't like me showing that.]
7/ They say that we didn't "register" as a poll watcher. Guilty as charged!! I was simply a member of the public, and GA law permits anyone to observe. All proceedings at the polling place must be conducted in public view.
8/ We are accused of being in the "voting booth" space of voters. The restricted area is within 6 feet of the machines. We never got that close to machines, nor were there any marked "restricted" areas. See statute on 6 foot rule.
9/ In fact when I was in the room with the voting machines in Dallas, NY Times reporters were on my right and @stphnfwlr on my left. And they had big cameras.

Dual standard? Selective "investigations" to come after witnesses who will be testifying against the BMDs?
10/ BTW, I took NO pictures.
So what is this about ?
The system test failed. The SOS doesn't want observers who have documentation of the widespread failures submitting the evidence in court. Trying to scare observers, like the ones who volunteered in early voting.
11/ But the truth cannot be concealed. The system failed and cannot possibly be installed in March without major meltdown. This horrible idea has to be stopped. That is why we are in court. And we will not be intimidated by the SOS's unethical tactics.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Marilyn Marks

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!