1) AND THERE IT IS!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN TODAY ON THE MENU IS THE DUMBASS THAT WANDERED ON OVER HERE PROLLY BECAUSE I MADE FUN OF HIS HERO THE PILLSBURY DOUGHBOY OF SOLDIERS!
Please extend a hearty middle finger to @HantesInferno and let's begin!
(Below: Vindman during parade)
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN TODAY ON THE MENU IS THE DUMBASS THAT WANDERED ON OVER HERE PROLLY BECAUSE I MADE FUN OF HIS HERO THE PILLSBURY DOUGHBOY OF SOLDIERS!
Please extend a hearty middle finger to @HantesInferno and let's begin!
(Below: Vindman during parade)
@HantesInferno 2) First off, allow me to demonstrate how this dumbass simply repeats what the talking bobbleheads on CNN, the shemans of MSNBC, and the gaggle of chucklefucks on ABC and NBC say without any fact checking whatsoever!
OH NO THERES BEEN EMOLUMENTS! OH LAWD
OH NO THERES BEEN EMOLUMENTS! OH LAWD
@HantesInferno 3) OH WAIT.
There has been.
archive.is/XmVa6
"In a legal victory for President Trump, a federal appeals court panel on Wednesday ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging that profits earned by his Washington hotel while he is in office violate the Constitution."
There has been.
archive.is/XmVa6
"In a legal victory for President Trump, a federal appeals court panel on Wednesday ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging that profits earned by his Washington hotel while he is in office violate the Constitution."
@HantesInferno 4) Having a lawsuit tossed out ass over teakettle by an appeals court tends to be a pretty rock solid form of exoneration, bucko.
But let's get to one of your other quips during your sperg-out.
NO LOGIC OR FACTS OH LAWD
But let's get to one of your other quips during your sperg-out.
NO LOGIC OR FACTS OH LAWD
@HantesInferno 5) I would like to refer you to the banner of my twitter page, in which I declare 'Reals over feels only in this dojo punk', which is what I said to the FIRST moron that wandered over here to my corner of Twitter. See, I'm ALL about the reals here, the facts and the logics.
@HantesInferno 6) I am SO into the Reals over the Feels, that JERK TULSI GABBARD PLAGIARIZED MY THREAD WHEN SHE DID HER DEBATE TAKEDOWN OF KAMALA HARRIS.
MY RAGE FOR THIS SLIGHT IS UNENDING AND I SHALL UNLEASH A VERITABLE OCEAN OF HELLFIRE IN MY VENGEANCE. threadreaderapp.com/thread/9269039…
MY RAGE FOR THIS SLIGHT IS UNENDING AND I SHALL UNLEASH A VERITABLE OCEAN OF HELLFIRE IN MY VENGEANCE. threadreaderapp.com/thread/9269039…
@HantesInferno 7) And yet you didn't read it. I did. Multiple times. And do you know what I've discovered?
@HantesInferno 8) That Ukraine wanted our help investigating one of our ambassadors. Probably something to do with the literal billions that should have gone to help bolster Ukraine that has been stolen through graft and corruption.
@HantesInferno 9) And if you READ MY THREAD, which I don't believe you did because you like all moronic lefties need information spoonfed to you from a trough of literal shit by the identical twins Tapper and Cuomo, I DID touch on lobbyists being PART of the corruption.
@HantesInferno 10) The words: "Hey, State Department and US AID, wtf happened to the money that was put into these 13 programs? You don't get anymore until you tell us."
The actions: State Department: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
The actions: State Department: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
@HantesInferno 11) There is not a single clip of anyone producing anything close to actionable information that might justify whatever the fuck Pelosi is calling Schiff's hearings this week. And this is going to lead into a wider point.
@HantesInferno 12) When someone is INNOCENT of something, it is not up to them to prove innocence, it is up to the investigator to prove wrongdoing.
You know what Mueller's job WASN'T? To exonerate Trump.
His job was to investigate and bring charges if necessary.
You know what Mueller's job WASN'T? To exonerate Trump.
His job was to investigate and bring charges if necessary.
@HantesInferno 13) When Mueller didn't bring charges, when Mueller's report spent a few dozen pages talking about how there was no linkage between any Russians and Trump campaign officials and then the rest of the time failing to bring obstruction charges, that means Trump was exonerated.
@HantesInferno 14) I don't care what a mumbling old who didn't read his own report says about whether he did or didn't exonerate Trump. In fact if you remember, but you don't because it wasn't spoonfed to you from a shit-trough, Dems were saying they 'read between the lines' of Mueller's report
@HantesInferno 15) They 'read between the lines' because Mueller didn't bring any charges against Trump so THEY had to. That was their justification for the last round of Planned Parenthood-style impeachment.
A vote which was ignominiously aborted. nbcnews.com/politics/congr…
A vote which was ignominiously aborted. nbcnews.com/politics/congr…
@HantesInferno 16) Facts over feels in this dojo, punk.
You see, I'mma tell you right now why you fail, your Democrat talking point troughs fail, why liberals will fail time and time and time again.
I can say something didn't happen. So long as no evidence exists that it did, I am right.
You see, I'mma tell you right now why you fail, your Democrat talking point troughs fail, why liberals will fail time and time and time again.
I can say something didn't happen. So long as no evidence exists that it did, I am right.
@HantesInferno 17) I can and will continue to be right until evidence is brought forwards that 'something' happened.
On the flip side, you can say something did happen. Now, you see, here, you will be wrong until you produce evidence that 'something' did happen.
On the flip side, you can say something did happen. Now, you see, here, you will be wrong until you produce evidence that 'something' did happen.
@HantesInferno 18) When I make my statement, I take a position of strength, and put the burden upon you to prove otherwise.
When you make your statement, you take a position of weakness not unlike the position you take in your native fetal position. The burden of proof is on you regardless.
When you make your statement, you take a position of weakness not unlike the position you take in your native fetal position. The burden of proof is on you regardless.
@HantesInferno 19) There exists no evidence, no phone call, no email, nothing, of Trump actually talking with the Russians.
There IS evidence of Obama having colluded with the Russians however.
Obama was so flexible he bent over backwards to let Putin fuck Ukraine.
There IS evidence of Obama having colluded with the Russians however.
Obama was so flexible he bent over backwards to let Putin fuck Ukraine.
@HantesInferno 20) Obama was so flexible, his anal cavity stretched several sizes to allow a drastically increased flow of aid into Ukraine for oligarchs to steal. Billions in fact. Almost none of it accounted for.
observer.com/2016/05/the-u-…
observer.com/2016/05/the-u-…
@HantesInferno 21) I will now make a statement. There is nothing wrong with trying to find out, through our State Department, what the fuck happened to the billions of dollars that Congress authorized and was earmarked for foreign aid, including to Ukraine.
@HantesInferno 22) In addition, I will posit that there is nothing wrong with asking Ukraine what might have happened to the money, and if they would look into that given there exists video evidence of an American politician bragging about getting an anticorruption prosecutor fired.
@HantesInferno 23) But, I will be fair to you, and I will argue from a position of weakness in claiming that there is no one LESS qualified to oversee our foreign policy regarding Ukraine than the US State Department officials who have been overseeing Ukraine policy for a decade.
@HantesInferno 24) My evidence for this is that the same people who were in charge of overseeing foreign policy for Ukraine have not accounting for ANY of the money sent to them in aid and IMF loans.
@HantesInferno 25) And one of them, Ambassador Beaker as I call her, worked with the State Dept to cause a communist revolution in Kyrgyzstan.
As I discovered earlier today while doing something ABSOLUTELY FOREIGN TO YOU: RESEARCH.
As I discovered earlier today while doing something ABSOLUTELY FOREIGN TO YOU: RESEARCH.
@HantesInferno 26) See, here's my problem, though, and this is why morons like you frustrate me so much: You can't formulate an argument. You have talking points.
Talking points are not arguments. They're empty vapid bullshit. Just like the leftist ideology.
Talking points are not arguments. They're empty vapid bullshit. Just like the leftist ideology.
@HantesInferno 27) I will posit one more argument, and this is from a position of strength, to note:
You cannot understand this meme I was throwing at you because you yourself are unintelligent and unable to articulate a thought beyond the simple bite sized talking points you're spoonfed.
You cannot understand this meme I was throwing at you because you yourself are unintelligent and unable to articulate a thought beyond the simple bite sized talking points you're spoonfed.
@HantesInferno 28) I'll break it down for you:
WE HAVE HEARD THAT LINE SO MANY FUCKING TIMES WE FIND IT FUCKING HILARIOUS WHEN YOU SAY IT.
EVERYTHING you say can be predicted, can be accounted for, and can be countered, easily and repeatedly.
WE HAVE HEARD THAT LINE SO MANY FUCKING TIMES WE FIND IT FUCKING HILARIOUS WHEN YOU SAY IT.
EVERYTHING you say can be predicted, can be accounted for, and can be countered, easily and repeatedly.
@HantesInferno 29) You don't get it, and the left doesn't get it.
We have entire ARSENALS prepared for countering vapid empty talking points because they're used so often, and they're so simple that preparing for new ones takes literally no time at all.
We have entire ARSENALS prepared for countering vapid empty talking points because they're used so often, and they're so simple that preparing for new ones takes literally no time at all.
@HantesInferno 30) As an example, I present to you this breakdown of Jim Jordan EVISCERATING Ambassador Taylor.
Note what happened here.
Jim Jordan read, studied, and was PREPARED for Taylor's talking points, and HAD A SHEET PRINTED OUT AND READY to make him look dumb
Note what happened here.
Jim Jordan read, studied, and was PREPARED for Taylor's talking points, and HAD A SHEET PRINTED OUT AND READY to make him look dumb
@HantesInferno 31) THAT IS MY EXISTENTIAL HELL EVERY DAY.
You people are FUCKING BORING to argue against.
You want to know why we aren't in an intellectual renaissance?
Because you can't even put up a good fight! There's nothing you can offer that even INTERESTS me anymore!
You people are FUCKING BORING to argue against.
You want to know why we aren't in an intellectual renaissance?
Because you can't even put up a good fight! There's nothing you can offer that even INTERESTS me anymore!
