I don’t like labels OR name-calling, it’s detrimental to ongoing discussion- but SPEAKING of ongoing discussion, why don’t we take a little look at fascism here? 1/
“The fact that not all fascists are like Hitler doesn't change the fact that fascist tactics are recognizable, consistent & dangerous.”
2/
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
“Between 2012-2016, according to a report by George Washington University’s Program on Extremism, there was a 600 percent increase in followers of American white-nationalist movements on Twitter alone” rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
“Before we say it can’t happen in the United States or Canada, let’s look at... warning signs of impending fascism.” 6/
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
- a divided, unhappy populace, often experiencing economic trouble
- leaders stoke this, pitting one group against another.
- they promise an economic miracle and blame “those people” for their problems.
8/
- they undermine credibility of universities and other higher education, trying to silence dissent and reasonable critique of their own policies or ideas. (Scientists, anyone?) 9/
No, don’t throw the term around casually- but don’t shy away from saying WHAT fascism IS. 11/
And that’s been your Saturday morning fascism thread. ✌🏻