Me: “Portions of the GOP are partnering with Russia to achieve their domestic political agenda.”
A person I respect: “I need evidence before I’ll believe that.”
So I put together a sampling of the evidence.
Buckle up. Here we go.
2013: Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation.
2014: Pat Buchanan noted that Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today” and stamping out western evil like easy divorce and homosexuality. See⤵️
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…
washingtonpost.com/news/democracy…
scribd.com/document/40010…
March 16, 2016: Sen. McCain accused Sen. Rand Paul of working for Putin: cnn.com/2017/03/16/pol…
Trump Tower Moscow was in the works (67-80)
Carter Page (95-103) touted his “high level contacts in Russia,” traveled to Russia and cultivated those (and more) contacts.
He met with Sergey Kislyak, who had been in the May 10 Oval Office meeting when Trump bragged about firing Comey.
July 19, 2018: Fox News began actively pushing Russia as an ally.
August 12, 2019: Jeanine Pirro on Fox asks “Who’s a greater threat—Putin or Mueller. newsweek.com/jeanine-pirro-…
May 4, 2019: Trump told Putin about the “Russian hoax” and didn’t tell him to stop interfering in our elections.
washingtonpost.com/politics/giuli…
That $1 million Lev Parnas lied about indicates that the Russians actually funded Operation Ukraine Shakedown.
Trump’s GOP defenders threw out lots of garbage but buried in all that yelling was an important strand that was easy to miss.
npr.org/2019/11/08/777…
Then, on day 2 of the impeachment debate, Matt Gaetz made the comment that stuck with me.
c-span.org/video/?467314-…
What did he mean by policy disagreements about how to make Ukraine great "again" ? 🤔
The problem in that sentence is causation ⤴️
Of course they're compromised: The Kompromat is the evidence Russia has that they take Russian help and do Russia's bidding.
This gives them too much credit.
It assumes that if they were not compromised, the wouldn't be siding with Russia.
A few people asked me⤵️. I won't know until next week. The person is someone I know professionally and isn't a Trump supporter.
@TimothyDSnyder commented that for a lot of people, it's hard to pull it all together.
We've been so bombarded with news.
On the other hand, when real scandals come rapid-fire, it's hard to integrate them and see the big picture.
That's also why my volunteer work this year is for voter protection groups.
The "base" is willing to allow Trump and pals to cheat, and monopolize the hydrocarbon industry because there is something the base wants more than economic advancement: They want a hierarchy with white (Christians) at the top.
This whole diversity thing and "equality for all" didn't really get started until after 1954 (Brown v Board) which is when the backlash started.
We're riding that backlash.
That's because it's really about a male-dominated hierarchy.
Rape and sexual harassment are means asserting patriarchal power ⤵️
My blog also has a search function and index.
White supremacy acknowledges the existence of other races, but envisions whites at the top of the hierarchy.