Too many ppl are formulating theories in order to explain the end result, concluding that we had no deaths bc Iran didn’t intend it.
Justifying the end result by shape-shifting cause-effect relationships is... well, it’s stupid.
These are missiles that hit targets; idk how anyone can downplay the significance of this.
The fact that we didn’t have casualties doesn’t downplay it, either.
I’m not suggesting I have an explanation, either.
I’m saying that we should take care to not bend facts into a preferable ‘reality’.
There are tons of interesting theories floating - explore them, test them... but let’s all stay grounded.
But having those in place, in addition to other intel gathering methods, is a far cry from assigning ‘intent’.
Again —> cause & effect!
Afterall, Benedict Arnold would have handed it over?
Of course not - it’s absurd! GW’s spies caught on... and we held West Point!
Cause —> Effect