"McCarthy could not hide his frustration with a reporter, Adam Klasfeld of @CourthouseNews, when he asked the leader to explain exactly what he had done with Mr. Parnas’s campaign contributions."
An in-depth and insightful profile of McCarthy, by @NYTLiz nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/…
An in-depth and insightful profile of McCarthy, by @NYTLiz nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/…
@CourthouseNews @NYTLiz McCarthy may have been frustrated, but he shouldn't have been surprised, as his office ignored detailed phone and email inquiries.
In his answer, McCarthy disclosed an interaction with Mr. Parnas at Trump's inauguration, one more than I reported here. courthousenews.com/indicted-giuli…
In his answer, McCarthy disclosed an interaction with Mr. Parnas at Trump's inauguration, one more than I reported here. courthousenews.com/indicted-giuli…
@CourthouseNews @NYTLiz That is to say, in his answers during two separate weekly press conferences, Leader McCarthy put new information on the public record that could be fact-checked or verified.
This is why it was useful to explore different questions related to the same topic, consistently.
This is why it was useful to explore different questions related to the same topic, consistently.
