Data for progressives who (a) don't think Biden is the Democrats' best candidate, and (b) know the field is going to slim down in February—and want to figure out who should be left standing.
BIDEN 4⃣7⃣, WARREN 4⃣5⃣
BIDEN 5⃣3⃣, SANDERS 4⃣1⃣
BIDEN 4⃣2⃣, WARREN 3⃣0⃣, SANDERS 2⃣3⃣
BIDEN 4⃣7⃣, WARREN 4⃣5⃣
BIDEN 5⃣3⃣, SANDERS 4⃣1⃣
BIDEN 4⃣2⃣, WARREN 3⃣0⃣, SANDERS 2⃣3⃣
PS/ To be candid about this: (1) I *like* Sanders; (2) I've *endorsed* Warren; (3) besides just liking Warren the most of all the candidates, (4) I've spoken to enough Clinton voters to know that they'll give this thing to Biden over Sanders *no matter what is required* to do so.
PS2/ IMO the party needs—as this particular POLITICO article happens to discuss—a unity candidate who is not just superlative but also (at the margins) palatable to any voters willing to appreciate more than just their one chosen candidate. Elizabeth Warren fits that description.
PS3/ Like I always say, this is just my opinion, I don't claim to be a genius when it comes to who people should vote for because I consider that a very *personal* decision, and I mention my views here because, well, this is Twitter and it's my feed. But not to disrespect anyone.
