Each of Trump's outrageous actions push us one step closer to what Hungarian scholar Balint Magyar calls a “mafia state,” — the term he uses to describe the kind of autocracies we see springing up in the former Soviet Union.
See: politicalscience.ceu.edu/events/2016-11…
That was his legal defense in Ukraine Operation Shakedown: What he was doing was in the national best interests. It also benefitted him. (Because he doesn't separate the two)
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
Magyar talks about the three stages of establishing autocracy.
Stage one, the “autocratic attempt,” is when potential regime change from democracy to autocracy is still reversible.
That's where we are.
The final stage is a full mafia state.
We talk about Trump running a “shadow” foreign policy alongside (and often in conflict with) the official State Department foreign policy.
newyorker.com/news/our-colum…
A president—the chief foreign policy official in the nation—can't, by definition, run a shadow foreign policy.
Mafia states—like Putin’s Russia—develop as the government takes over businesses.
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
Eventually, the entire state comes under the control of the head of the family.
In other words, the ruler ends up owning the country.
So the head of a mafia state is directly analogous to a mafia don.
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
We are in the reversible stage.
For one thing, our elections still have meaning (that's how the Democrats won big in 2017 and 2018).
I’m working on a thread right now about positive steps being taken to dislodge Trump and his mafia state.
Unintended consequences: To save conservatism at any cost, you have to break rules.
Once the rules are broken, all fairness is gone. Those who voted for rule breakers thinking they'll benefit, but they suffer when there are no rules.
My blog has a search function, and an email signup for notification when I have a new blog post.