It is 10:38 PM CST on Wednesday, Feb. 19, not even an hour after Elizabeth Warren dominated the Democratic debate, so here is a thread of the current homepages of a number of major U.S. newspapers. 1/
.@washingtonpost mentions some of Warren's comments, though not those about sexism, racial justice, and environmental justice. The coverage centers around Bloomberg and Sanders.
It's not going to get better from here, folx. 2/
It's not going to get better from here, folx. 2/
@washingtonpost This is from @nytimes. The focus? Bloomberg. Warren is mentioned relative to her speaking time, but the substance of what she said doesn't seem to merit a headline. 3/
@washingtonpost @nytimes At least @WSJ mentioned the actual issues discussed in the debate, rather than reducing it to an "onslaught" of "attacks". (Worth noting that the photo is actually a photo carousel, so there are pics of the other candidates included.) 4/
@washingtonpost @nytimes @WSJ Meanwhile, @BostonGlobe can talk about Warren but can't seem to quite nail the spelling of her name. 5/
@washingtonpost @nytimes @WSJ @BostonGlobe This is from @latimes. Sanders and Bloomberg get space. For some reason Yang gets space. Neither woman candidate seems to merit a mention. 6/
@washingtonpost @nytimes @WSJ @BostonGlobe @latimes .@politico, well, owns itself with its lead photo, where Warren waits patiently for a chance to be noticed amongst repeated headlines featuring Bloomberg and Sanders. Meanwhile Buttigieg and Biden are also here for some reason. 7/
@washingtonpost @nytimes @WSJ @BostonGlobe @latimes @politico To the entire mainstream media: what will it take for you to center women? Why is the headline "man called out," rather than "woman calls out man"? /fin
@washingtonpost @nytimes @WSJ @BostonGlobe @latimes @politico Y'all, they made it worse and put "Warren wants to fight everyone" in a headline. Y'know, making her refusal to stand for racism & sexism in the primary & in policy into an act of aggression.
