Those are the science of epidemiology and the biology; the other is the science of psychology and the behaviour.
They need to know what the infection rate is and predict...
Once they know that they need to the know how to change behaviour so that it will reduce the infection to a manageable level, whatever that is, without unsustainable unintended damage to economy and people's normal health and wellbeing. . .
That is a welcome transparency, but. . .
So we can only guess what the government is doing in relation to this key part of their strategy. To control the disease they need. . .
At the moment the govt. are trying to achieve behaviour change by appealing to people to. . .
The answer depends what they want to achieve. If they want almost 100% compliance and everyone to do what they have been asked, then clearly it is not working. It is having a big impact but not total. We haven't seen. . .
If the govt. want some compliance - say 70% - but not total compliance, then they might be achieving it. What is important is that they are achieving the level they need based on the epidemiology. The two need to link...
There are many approaches to behaviour change. Government depts tend to favour what is nicknamed 'nudge' psychology, where you nudge people toward the ultimate behaviour you want...
The coronavirus epidemic is progressing quickly. This raises a question of whether there is time to gradually nudge people towards the behaviour the strategy and epidemiology shows we need. . .
As infection rapidly rises, I wonder whether it might not now be sensible to shift from a 'nudge' approach to more of a 'shove' approach.
Data could tell us. Time will tell us.