(Too) many reasons are given for this, even avoiding #nuclear war, but there's a problem with these excuses for🇺🇦- AND for🇩🇪& its #NATO allies
a🧵
Here's the latest interview with #Scholz in @derspiegel He steers a question about supplying proper weapons to 1) #Germany becoming a party to the war in #Ukraine 2) The danger of a direct confrontation between NATO & Russia 3) WW3 & Nuclear war
As you can see from the quotes below
- and despite the best efforts of the journalists -
there's a lot of diversion, deflection & flim-flam going on here ...
The key point seems to be to keep stoking and manipulating fear among #Germany's population
Stoking this fear & keeping the threat of nuclear war at the front of people's minds is an attempt to excuse #Germany's hesitance to directly send #heavyweapons
(even if in all likelihood its a vanishingly small possibility - Putin, so scared of COVID, knows NATO has nukes too!)
It's not just general escalation though - and its not just #Scholz & the SPD. #Germany's vice-chancellor, the Greens' Robert #Habeck warned explicitly that sending e.g. modern, western tanks to #Ukraine could make the West, and especially Germany, a target politico.eu/article/berlin…
In the same speech #Habeck also seemed to claim that other #NATO allies weren't sending heavy weapons for this reason - that ignored the tanks, MLRS. howitzers & air defence systems provided by e.g. #Czechia & #Slovakia, which mislead #Germany's public
Even if it was 'Western' systems #Habeck was referring to, that's pretty patronising to #Germany's #CEE#NATO allies incl.🇵🇱which also provided significant amounts of weapons and other support to Ukraine - as well as openly calling for #Putin's #Russia to be challenged.
It also wouldn't make any sense if, as according to some speculation, #Germany is considering backfilling the stocks of e.g. #Italy so that Rome could send tanks to #Ukraine
What this approach really does is manipulate fear of becoming a target or of escalation - incl. all the way to 'World War 3' or nuclear war - to justify inaction/ slow, minimal action. That's really low, considering #Ukraine's needs & badly lets 🇺🇦 down. themoscowtimes.com/2022/04/22/in-…
BUT it's also really bad for #Germany's reputation.🇩🇪not only failing to do its part and thus burning through the hard won moral capital that it built up after WW2 ... it's also risking its credibility with its allies & thus its own security
Deterrence is based on credibility - for #NATO, the credibility of #article5 which sees an attack on one ally as an attack on all.
Allies commit to aid their fellow alliance members in the event of an attack. #Germany's leaders' rhetoric questions that. nato.int/cps/en/natohq/…
This is noticed. Particularly in #CEE capitals
- and especially the ones that would bear the brunt of any attack. Here's the deputy director of a leading think tank in #Poland
Now, we can argue about how fair that is - #Germany has after all helped backfill #Slovakia' s air defence so they could supply #Ukraine - & contributes to the new #NATO Enhanced Forward Presence in the country (as well as to NATO & its EFPs more widely. euractiv.com/section/politi…
BUT this is ultimately about belief on the part of allies and that's what's coming under real question with #Germany's approach to the war in #Ukraine & the excuses it gives for not really helping.
That undermines the contributions 🇩🇪 *does* make
- & its alliance credibility
So too does #Germany's inflexibility on nuclear power
& unwillingness to unequivocally endorse #Ukraine's candidacy for membership of the #EU
BECAUSE all this contributes to the image of a very narrowly self-interested approach (however miscalculated)
So, what to do?
Drop the excuses, stop misleading #Germany's public, stop disrespecting allies & pretending 🇩🇪 is not going it alone.
Stop using unjustified fears to manipulate public opinion & excuse inaction
And, above all, really help #Ukraine
(& thus reassure #NATO allies)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Germany’s response to #Russia’s assault on #Ukraine is an abject disappointment.
Why be so hard on #Germany?
Because:
- Ukraine needs & deserves much better
- We all need a Germany that does much better
(including Germans). A 🧵
#Germany has not unequivocally endorsed #Ukraine's #EU candidacy bid;
- was slow to provide weapons of any kind;
- is dragging its feet over providing #heavyweapons;
- delayed the #EU ban on🇷🇺coal, &
- STILL buys the most🇷🇺gas, giving billions of Euros to #Putin.
This is particularly hard to bear as #Germany COULD do so much more.
A fully engaged Germany COULD make such a difference - as when it boldly accepted millions of refugees - in the 1990s and in 2015.
It believed in its best sides & promised "#wirschaffendas" "we can manage it"
A 🧵 on why it's better for #Germany to get proactive instead of getting offended over #Ukraine.
Steinmeier being unwelcome in #Kyiv is bad.
I'm not criticising #Zelenskiy's decision (which is justified) but that it came to this is everyone's detriment.
As such, it's an important moment to reflect & consider, why it happened & what to do better.
#Steinmeier was not welcomed because of his past closeness to Putin's #Russia. He has publicly regretted this but its clear that for Kyiv apology ≠ atonement. Let's be honest the ill-judged harmony concert & FWS' spox criticism of @MelnykAndrij didn't help, BUT
Some of observations on Heavy #Weapons transfers to #Ukraine
11/🧵:
1. Transferring any and all heavy weapons is good. Especially of types that 🇺🇦 has asked for.
Therefore it’s good that Hweapons are increasingly delivered by many countries
(eg 🇨🇿🇸🇰🇬🇧) & discussed in 🇩🇪.
BUT
2. The endless debates on how long it takes to train crews to use eg Tanks & IFVs are starting to sound like excuses not reasons. Clearly it’s not poss to just climb in & drive off, but 🇩🇪seems to over complicate this, to say the least.
3. Rather than continuing to talk down to #Ukraine, #Germany’s politicians should consider that the 🇩🇪way is not the only way, & may not even be the best way.
Relative recent performance of 🇺🇦&🇩🇪 militaries needs to be considered- as does accelerated learning in wartime.
This is a really interesting point. I remember, at an academic conference in 2017, being told that if Central & East Europeans really wanted to integrate into the EU, they should take on Western Europe’s colonial guilt as well.
There is a big need for the EU to reckon with its colonial past - & present! - & to stop going down a civilisational, essentialised identity track, to which CEE conservatives have also contributed. BUT, that’s not the only relevant line about the EU or CEE. RU is way worse here.
Treatment of refugees in this instance- which is great- shows what BS it was last time. Willingness was lacking, not capacity. That must change more widely- if we are serious about winning systemic competition, we have to values we espouse- universal not ‘european’.
Why Europe's #StrategicCompass Points to Trouble Ahead 🧵 1. The EU's #Gymnich meeting last week confirmed the direction of the Union's draft security strategy, the 'Strategic Compass
This is bad news - for the #EU, the #US, #NATO & liberal ordering. ip-quarterly.com/en/why-europes…
2. Many experts have worried that the compass will just be another false dawn in European security and defence - more big promises without the possibility of delivering the capabilities needed to make good on them. In short - the EU's ego is writing cheques its body can't cash.
3. That ongoing capability gap will cause problems BUT its not the biggest risk the new strategy poses. The #StrategicCompass presents the darkest worldview ever avowed by the #EU- a far cry from its previous- & successful -progressive, optimistic approach ip-quarterly.com/en/why-europes…
Excellent news from #Czechia@JanLipavsky’s confirmation is a very positive step. BUT … a short 🧵on #czech politics. 1. Beware expectations raised a little high here. portraying @P_Fiala as #Havel’s heir is v. problematic - he has a strange rel to #EU
2. @JanLipavsky is from a different party than @P_Fiala - the pirates, who along with STAN have a much stronger claim to be the standard bearers of Havelism in #Czechia today.
Fiala’s support 4 Lipavsky is great but this is as much domestic power politics (v Zeman) as principle
3. The two are, nonetheless, connected as Zeman as been not only a disastrous President morally (migration, Allegations of corruption & influence from kremlin,etc) but an enabler for both 🇷🇺 & 🇨🇳 in 🇨🇿.
We can expect to see that diminish without Babis facilitating Zeman.