“*The Probabilities Are Enormous That There Are Unperceivable Beings, Unimaginable Realities, Unknown Ways of Perceiving...an Infinite Number of Worlds*”
“…neural “firings” from external stimuli are routed through interior areas of the brain that deal with fundamental physiological processes *before* those “messages” find their way into the cortical areas where they are then interpreted.”
“This, of course, makes perfect sense. There is nothing *inherently* painful in a stimulus that is produced by something whose molecules are moving at such a speed & manner that one would measure its temperature at, say, 150 degrees Fahrenheit.”
“One could easily imagine a species for which that particular vibrational rate would be within its tolerance range. The quality of pain is relative to the perceiving organism.”
“Similarly, there is nothing inherently “pleasurable” in a caress—that is, the pattern of stimuli involving the moving of one particular organism’s skin against another’s...in a particular way.”
“Those “particulars,” along with other aspects, are what go into defining *caress* by means of a complex communication among billions of neural cells & their components in a specific area of the brain: the cerebral cortex.”
“One can conceive of some biological organisms who would interpret such touching as a dire threat. Again, the interpretations of external stimuli are relative to the biological makeup of the perceiver.”
“Therefore, in a purely psychophysiological way, the world “out there” is not defined in & of itself. Rather, it is *purely* defined in the part of the person that stores cultural information—the cortex.”
“But our examples emphasize that prior to any cultural interpretation, a “species” interpretation is made based upon the biological “hardware” of the organism.”
“That is to say that these “vibrational rates” of molecules—using once more the example of temperature—are not in & of themselves even “stimuli” except that certain other neurons in other parts of the body, including “lower” parts of the brain,."
“…[these “vibrational rates” of molecules are not in & of themselves even “stimuli” except that certain other neurons in other parts of the body] in a complex intercommunication once again, define them as such.”
““Vibratory rates “out there” are *not* patterns of neural firings. & to suppose that there is, in some magical-mystical sort of way, a kind of authentic, exact replication of the “out there” by our particular sensory apparatus…”
“…is not only to state more than is conceivably possible to be stated...and to reveal an adherence to a kind of “faith” that is more reminiscent of religion than true science...it is also indisputably anthropocentric.”
“For even our thus limited sensory apparatus informs us of other sentient creatures whose sensory systems are different than our own, indeed, vastly different in some cases.”
“Even among the species that we perceive as having the major five senses as we do, we observe differences: An eagle sees farther & better—certainly its world does not *look* like ours;”
“…a dog hears a much wider range of auditory waves—certainly its world does not *sound* like ours. What then of species whose senses, as nearly as we can determine with our own, are vastly different or less in number than ours?”
“Indeed, can we assume, in fairness, that our own senses are capable of perceiving all major aspects of “objective” reality, granting, even, if in limited or distorted fashion?”
“It would be ridiculous to suppose that an earthworm or an amoeba...with apparently few, & more limited, senses...“knows” of the existence of our species in any ways other than, if anything, a series of obstacles,..”
“Correspondingly, can we automatically assume that *our* particular number & set of senses, with their particular ranges, are the endpoint, the pinnacle of what is possible in terms of perceiving “world”?”
“If a sixth, a seventh, an eighth, an *n*th number of “types” of senses were possible, how would we know of that possibility with our five? Would we not be in a situation analogous to that of the earthworm to us?”
“Why would we bother to, how could we, even, measure the referents in the “out there” corresponding to such hypothetical senses in a way that they would somehow be included in our science?”
“Why would we bother to, how could we, even, measure the referents in the “out there” corresponding to such hypothetical senses in a way that they would somehow be included in our science?”
“Furthermore, keeping in mind that earthworm (who, we might assume for the sake of argument, perceives a *Homo sapiens* as something earthwormocentrically akin to pressure, an obstacle,..”
“…or earthwormomolecular vibrations, in other words, earthworm hot-or-coldness), how would we know of the existence of other sentient beings—not to mention other even more unimaginable realities—"
“…[how would we know of the existence of other sentient beings] —who or which could hypothetically be outside of the range and/or number of our *biologically unique* senses?”
“Would we perceive their existence as human changes in pressure, sound, touch, smell, sight, taste? As atmospheric or environmental “ambiance” changes? As solar activity or astronomical phenomena?”
“As change in mood state, or thought pattern? Or hypothalamic or metabolic or heart or respiratory rate change? As nuemenon, “aura,” Words of God, Music of the Spheres?...”
“Indeed, as leprechauns, ghosts, or elves? Or perhaps as forcible elements in dreams? Inspirational thought or feeling? Poltergeists, angels, “allies,” aliens, psychic phenomena?”
“Would they be totally out of the domain of detection by anything within our experience—whether sensory, cognitive, affective, intuitive, hallucinative?”
“The point is that we have no, absolutely no, way of knowing what is *real*ly real, what it “all” *real*-ly *looks* like unless we anthropocentrically assume that we are “God’s chosen species,” the summit of creation..."
“…& [unless we anthropocentrically assume that we are] magically endowed with a one-in-a-half billion (that is, approximately the number of other known species) uniquely correct number of sensations & accuracy of perception.”
“We have no way of knowing even whether or not we are in the same “space” at the same “time” (the quotation marks bc these are sensorily determined in our species’s unique biological way) as other unperceivable beings, even *sentient* ones...”
“It should be supremely clear by now, esp among those of us with a transcultural or anthropological familiarity, wherein we are made distinctly aware of the truth-shrouding nature of ethnocentrism,..”
“…[It should be supremely clear by now] that any serious attempt at discerning truth is not compatible with *any* variety of self-serving, self-aggrandizing, or egocentric agenda.”
“Thus, it is just as essential to throw off the overweening species-centric intellectual baggage of our Judeo-Christian tradition...which posits “man” as the ruler over nature & as the summit of created species...”
“…[it is just as essential to throw off the overweening species-centric intellectual baggage of our Judeo-Christian tradition] as it is essential to strive to drop our ethnocentric blinders.”
“Indeed, making this attempt to view from a neutral, Archimedean, nonanthropocentric “window,” it follows logically that the probabilities are enormous that there are, in fact, other, unperceivable beings, unknown & unimaginable realities,..”
“…[it follows logically that the probabilities are enormous that there are, in fact,] other & different senses...and, yes, as one new physics proposition puts it, an infinite number of “worlds.””
“Experience, shared, is the nature of Existence & the grand total of minds in the Universe is 1. As quantum physicist, Erwin Schrödinger phased it, ““The total number of minds in the universe is one.”
& since we are all aspects of that one Mind or Divinity & our participation in that Divinity is the fractal of experience we call our life, then our very experience is our Divinity & the combined total of all Experience, all of that One Mind,..
…[our very experience is our Divinity & the combined total of all Experience, all of that One Mind,] is God, or Divinity. Thus, Experience Is Divinity.
and Experience, indeed…as our experiences in the experiential modalities & spirituality in general show…our very experience is indeed our Divine guiding self.
That our very experience is Divinity, is Experience, has profound implications for spiritual growth, psychotherapy, philosophy, quantum, & metaphysics.
The book, *Experience Is Divinity*, shows how in our coming into being as individuals of the species human, we repressed our innate connection with Divinity.”
This repression of our innate connection with Divinity was done as part of the Game of humanness, wherein God (gods, Divinity) becomes less than Itself to set off the glorious ad-venture of Existence. Of Experience.
This book rests on the latest findings of research into nonordinary states. It is informed by the research of Stanislav Grof, of the author & his wife’s own nonordinary experiences, of quantum physics, & of primal & other experiential modalities.
The complete book is available online at the links
you can read the book, which is posted on the blog, or you can follow the directions there & download a free copy of *Experience Is Divinity: Matter As Metaphor*.
If you like & agree with these ideas & want more attention & thought brought to them, feel free to download the book & pass it around, as you wish; use it to spread these ideas.
It is time now for humans to regain the primal legacy of belongingness in Divinity & Nature, which we lost when we put ourselves up as the crown of creation & at the peak of some evolutionary pyramid, with “dominion” over all the rest.
*Dance of the Seven Veils I: Primal/Identity Psychology, Mythology, & Your Real Self* is now available to all on my blog & it can be downloaded as a pdf file, with my compliments. Click links.
[] “In becoming more numbed to their empathy & fellow feeling, they became inured enough to the spilling of blood, so that making life & death decisions over fellow planetmates became easier.” []
[*Quotes/highlights:*] “…in ‘evolved’ economic systems, we make certain we will not feel relief from the threat of lack (oxygen starvation/ fetal malnutrition): For we insist on a ‘dog eat dog’ competitive system like capitalism,..” []
“Okay, so who helped them? Well, like I was saying.… The first thing is you have politicians with the Big Lie, & they’re repeating it endlessly. & that persistence is so extremely effective & comprehensive.”
*Dance of the Seven Veils I: Primal/Identity Psychology, Mythology, & Your Real Self* is now available to all on my blog & it can be downloaded as a pdf file, with my compliments. Click links.