the worst was this: capitalism made the #Internet a *joke*.
(1/x)
it's still a joke. @mtaibbi and @jessesingal and @mattyglesias, and the rest of the elite "influencer" set who have proliferated in American #journalism (and polluted it), have assisted immensely in this massive _trivialization_ of a technological achievement.
(2/x)
and for no other reason than right-wing spite: the @GOP is a party of hatreds and they *loathe* Sen. @algore, who would have made a much better President than the genocidal coke fiend from Connecticut/Texas. they associated "the Internet" with Sen. Gore, and spat on it.
(3/x)
the @GOP / #conservative / #Christian set in America, the @pastorlocke and @JackPosobiec sort of person, lusts after the Internet the same way they lust for money: they grab as much Internet (and as much money) as possible, while castigating everyone else for being greedy.
(4/x)
in typical Western doublethinkful fashion, we are supposed to regard the Internet as a joke AND we're supposed to entrust our Future to it. @elonmusk is a perfect example of what sort of human being gets the most out of this racket: #capitalism's vision for the #Internet.
(5/x)
(oh, forgive me, Mr. @mtaibbi. I'll give the word "racket" back to you now. I know you're fond of it.)
considering the appalling state of the #Internet, it's safe to conclude that #capitalism really and truly has made a pig's breakfast of it.
the capitalists (like @pmarca and @elonmusk) wanted it both ways: they made the Internet both necessary *and* an elite plaything.
(6/x)
@mtaibbi's banked his professional reputation (what's left of it) on pretending that the #TwitterFiles are the new Dreyfus affair—that is to say, a massive scandal exposing a vast corruption (cf. how Alfred Dreyfus revealed the noxious antisemitism in French society.)
(7/x)
Mr. @mtaibbi thinks the #TwitterFiles are all important; he *also* thinks that @Twitter is a joke and he's probably hoping that @elonmusk chews it up and spits it out soon.
doublethink must seem like *magic*, to these people. they sprinkle it into everything.
I am not a #Christian; my friend Chara (who writes at @KrisAtLarge) is Catholic—albeit a heretical one—but I am no "believer". as I've said, I tend to leave religion to others.
all the same, it's tough *not* to have opinions about #Christianity—we're inundated with it.
(1/x)
in the United States especially, right-wing politics—which infallibly promotes an extremist and hyperpoliticized form of #Christianity—pours enormous effort and money into publicizing #Christian political demands.
@GOP politics and Bible-bashing are practically the same.
(2/x)
in fact, it seems like *all* public spokespersons for Christianity in the U.S. are political figures. #Christian@GOP politicians and activists and corporate executives proudly proclaim their purpose in public office to be the promotion of "Jesus" and "faith" and "values".
#geopolitical tedium is not for me. I like the world of ordinary matter and energy (and physics and chemistry and all of it) far too much. I like tools and instruments and equipment, and knowing how to use them. fretting about #Russia or #China is not my highest priority.
(1/x)
yet American #politics and political #media have completely inundated popular culture—because @jack Dorsey and #MarkZuckerberg permitted the politicization of #Internet#socialmedia. on specious grounds they kicked down the door between "public" and "private" online.
America's political right-wing has undergone remarkable evolution since the fraudulent installation of @RonaldReagan into the White House in 1980. there's an irony in how the 1980s and 1990s @GOP and their partisans was proud of "right-wing" as a label: Rush is Right!
(1/x)
because now nobody wants "right-wing" or "conservative" to stick to them. instead the game is to pretend that *none* of that political language means anything at all any more—in other words, you can call yourself anything and it means about the same. the @mtaibbi method.
(2/x)
heck, @Sargon_of_Akkad is an extreme right-wing *reactionary*, someone who wants to roll back the social clock to the days of chattel slavery—and he's "centrist" in the same way that @mtaibbi is "independent". they don't *want* the words to mean anything.
#IdentityPolitics. #IdPol. neither seems to be a popular hashtag. I'm not sure that I've seen the term that often lately; political propaganda has fads and changes of weather; buzzwords float into and out of fashion.
@mtaibbi is, here, *practicing* "identity politics".
that is to say, he's sheltering from criticism behind the shield of his "independence"—that's the *personal brand* that @mtaibbi has established for himself.
"independent" is a highly politicized and *dishonest* political identity; usually it's a straightforward lie.
he's too cagey to admit that he's got financial ties to @elonmusk, but "insider trading" and corrupt #journalism are *in vogue* these days; all the elite influencers of the Taibbi / @EliLake / @jbarro set undoubtedly play the markets.
I'd like to talk more about the #cryptocurrency / #blockchain phenomenon, starting again with the way that the #crypto crowd once leaned very heavily into the pretence that their cryptographic thingummies had "intrinsic value" and that they were "mined" like #gold.
the big names in #cryptocurrency especially, like @Bitcoin / $BITC and @ethereum / $ETH, fuelled this nonsense by asserting that ordinary currencies, government-backed #money, was mere "fiat money" whereas the #cryptocurrencies had some nebulous "intrinsic value".
(2/x)
you'll still find a *lot* of #cryptocurrency gamblers and grifters who cling to the "fiat money" canard. search for "fiat money" on @Twitter and you'll find some amusing examples. this was part of a general #sales pitch for #cryptocurrencies as somehow being _independent_.
#capitalism and capitalists' fortunes are built on this practice. all the free-flowing #business and #finance propaganda, churned out in huge volumes for the edification of persons who've devoted themselves to #money, talks about _investing_.
the great bulk of money made in #capitalism goes only to the ownership class; the toilers below them get pennies. those unable to toil get *less* than nothing—capitalism wants such people to be liquidated, hence @charlesmurray and @EPoe187 cook up rationales for doing so.
(2/x)
ultimately this is *why* #eugenics and "scientific racism" exists at all: #capitalism needs some pseudointellectual justification for marginalizing and liquidating all human beings who are unable or *unwilling* to toil for capitalism. this is WHY @Quillette is well-funded.