#IdentityPolitics. #IdPol. neither seems to be a popular hashtag. I'm not sure that I've seen the term that often lately; political propaganda has fads and changes of weather; buzzwords float into and out of fashion.
@mtaibbi is, here, *practicing* "identity politics".
that is to say, he's sheltering from criticism behind the shield of his "independence"—that's the *personal brand* that @mtaibbi has established for himself.
"independent" is a highly politicized and *dishonest* political identity; usually it's a straightforward lie.
he's too cagey to admit that he's got financial ties to @elonmusk, but "insider trading" and corrupt #journalism are *in vogue* these days; all the elite influencers of the Taibbi / @EliLake / @jbarro set undoubtedly play the markets.
(3/x)
in all probability they don't even think of it as corruption, merely as "putting their money to work"—all the #business and #finance propaganda has made "passive income", i.e. gambling on #investment and #cryptocurrency and the like, seem like a routine and harmless thing.
(4/x)
the mere expression "putting money to work" is a falsity; #money is inanimate, and does not "work". real human beings do have to work, however, in able to make @mtaibbi's or @jbarro's #investment portfolios "grow" (again it's like the money just...makes itself get bigger.)
(5/x)
@RonaldReagan, the @GOP's witless grinning postercard President, helped inaugurate the blossoming of corruption and moral decay in the professional world—the free mixing of #politics and #journalism with #business and #finance. Reagan's cabinet were crooks of this sort.
(6/x)
the Reaganites were people who loved their power to play #business off against #government, using friendships and sweetheart deals (and fraud) to scam huge amounts of money from the public treasury. now, everybody does it. @BillClinton and @HillaryClinton are rich from it.
(7/x)
beyond doubt @mtaibbi is just as mixed up in this freewheeling culture as anybody else. he's in a highly privileged and frankly rather *cozy* sort of propaganda job, so he's already got a lot of money to "put to work", i.e. he's likely vested in lots of #business ventures.
(8/x)
and if *any* of his "passive income" is tied to @elonmusk, then @mtaibbi has been *bought* by #ElonMusk. Matt Taibbi would have a _conflict of interest_: as a journalist (supposedly) he's got a public duty to the truth, but if he's hoping Musk will make him *rich*...
(9/x)
...then @mtaibbi has a straightforward conflict of interest between @elonmusk and his duty to the public, as a member of the Fourth Estate—however "independent" and "nuanced" a journalist Matt Taibbi pretends to be, he's still supposed to have some professional ethics.
(10/x)
I myself think that there's absolutely no reason why any sensible human being should believe a single word that Mr. @mtaibbi says, writes, types, or scribbles.
I believe that he has clearly shown himself as a traitor to #journalism, in fact.
one more rumination for tonight, I think. this one is about something that's been called "contrarianism"—a word that's been coined in some attempt to describe the perplexing behavior of celebrity 'influencers', specially the more toxic ones like @mtaibbi and @mattyglesias.
(1/x)
but the behavior is probably quite general. just about *all* of the #journalist and #media figures who have some privileged access to the press and to mass audience have learned to behave in this way on @Twitter and social media: they run away from challenging questions.
(2/x)
the blue-checked "influencers" of the @LPDonovan / @StevenTDennis / @JakeSherman sort (I've picked three names almost at random) are the people who have *benefited the most* from the #Internet-ization of #journalism. social media has amplified their social privilege.
the noisemakers at all levels of the #conservative noise machine, from the august @AEI propagandists (like "race scientist" @charlesmurray) to circus sideshows like @Timcast, try to blame "woke", but...
(1/x)
that "woke" game is extremely thin by now. really it's just rebranded Red Scare nonsense. in 1950, it was Commies who were "destroying our youth" with virulent ideas that right-wing ideologues didn't like, like abstract algebra; now @mtracey and @DouthatNYT blame "woke".
(2/x)
but ask any low-level right-wing expert on "woke"—ask @realchrisrufo or @ConceptualJames what "wokeism" actually *is*—and you'll get the word "Marxism" in no time: "woke" is, in other words, nothing new at all. it's the same old paranoia about pinko Rooskies in closets.
#capitalism requires what people call "magical thinking". it requires people to believe that impossible things aren't merely *possible*, but can be done routinely, and turned into a dependable cash flow. #AI / #AGI of the @fchollet / @JeffDean sort is a perfect example.
the very name "#AGI" gives the game away: the #programming boys daydream that they've invented a "general intelligence", a universal thinking machine capable of solving literally any problem—and #capitalism is willing to gamble on that. it's just what #business wants.
(2/x)
remember that the ideal corporation in #capitalism *does nothing*. it produces nothing, it provides no service, it solves no problems for anyone not in the ownership hierarchy—because producing things *costs money* and capitalists hate all expenditures for any reason.
more #cryptocurrency talk. it seems that there may be (another) #cryptocrash developing; there's been so many of them.
to reiterate my earlier point: the allure of #cryptocurrencies is instant #money in vast volumes, and that's why $BITC and @ETH have a million copycats.
#cryptocurrency (and the related #blockchain money-making gewgaw, the #NFT) are in a sense nothing new. there have been untold millions of #investment scams and #business tricks and other shifty clever ways that at least *pretend* they can guarantee an effortless #profit.
(2/x)
this is an artifact of the extreme #wealth inequality encouraged by #capitalism: once you've got a bunch of elite capitalists *hoarding* all the #money, that means you've got big enough piles to *steal*. all get-rich-quick schemes are ultimately acts of disguised _theft_.
the central lie is that "the markets" (i.e. the sum total of all monetary transactions by all money-seeking entities in #capitalism) are the best possible mechanism for fulfilling every conceivable human need.
if it's not "on the market", then you don't really need it.
I am not a #Christian; my friend Chara (who writes at @KrisAtLarge) is Catholic—albeit a heretical one—but I am no "believer". as I've said, I tend to leave religion to others.
all the same, it's tough *not* to have opinions about #Christianity—we're inundated with it.
(1/x)
in the United States especially, right-wing politics—which infallibly promotes an extremist and hyperpoliticized form of #Christianity—pours enormous effort and money into publicizing #Christian political demands.
@GOP politics and Bible-bashing are practically the same.
(2/x)
in fact, it seems like *all* public spokespersons for Christianity in the U.S. are political figures. #Christian@GOP politicians and activists and corporate executives proudly proclaim their purpose in public office to be the promotion of "Jesus" and "faith" and "values".