Thread by @SMaurizi

1. just want to clarify this important point in the @ggreenwald's interview w/ @MashiRafael. Glenn writes:"Despite the fact that Swedish prosecutors dropped its sex crimes investigation last May (not because they concluded #Assange was innocent, but because they believed

2. they believed further efforts to bring him to Sweden were futile)". My #FOIA litigation reveals that @cpsuk advised the #Swedish prosecutors against the ONLY investigative strategy which could have allowed a quick solution: interviewing Julian #Assange in London

3. so it was a VERY precise choice by @cpsuk and indeed at some point, in 2013, even the Swedish prosecutors started having doubts about this @cpsuk's legal strategy. ALL these FACTS have been unearthed by my #FOIA, as anyone can read here (English):repubblica.it/esteri/2018/02…

4. in addition to this #Assange had been already questioned in 2010 and the investigation on rape had been terminated by the Swedish prosecutor, Eva Finné. Once reopened by Marianne Ny,#Assange had tried many options to be questioned by Ny

5. documents I obtained under #FOIA from the Swedish prosecution Authority confirms #Assange had NEVER escaped from questioning by the Swedish prosecutors.

6. I am fighting to obtain the full documents on the case to acquire FACTUAL information: the huge difficulties I have experienced in this FOIA throughout the last 3 years, the destructions of @cpsuk's emails are very suspicious