First panel at #signs2018 @ScienceMarchDC on how science is communicated, history of ethics, who gets included and benefits from science: 
@ScienceMarchDC Q for panel: Why is it important for advocates to understand not only methods, successes, processes of science, but also it's history? #SIGNS2018
@ScienceMarchDC A: @greenkels For context - to understand that there are communities that have received no benefits from giving access/resources to those getting grants, publications, tenure #SIGNS2018
@ScienceMarchDC A: @kstsosie Understanding the history of broad consent, how it has been misused, and why the switch to individual consent occurred - to discuss the concerns with pushing back to broad consent in the age of big data/genomics #SIGNS2018
@ScienceMarchDC Discussion on how we are ineffective at using science to effect change: due to factors such as financial interests, ego, lack of representation, lack of understanding in political spheres, for example
@ScienceMarchDC Q from audience: How do we increase faculty diversity? A: @Renetta_Tull - willingness to engage with and welcome into your community/find out how to make them welcome laccei.org/LACCEI2016-San…
@ScienceMarchDC A: @greenkels Desire to move to places, and concern about existing in those places - makes a difference if they can point to other faculty of color who can let candidates know about experience in that location/institution #SIGNS2018
@ScienceMarchDC A: Also consider retention - will they support you through tenure, will someone in your department tear you down, will they support you to tenure if interest groups come after you? #SIGNS2018
