It was constitutionally required to CONSENT to seat Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court?
"Art. I, Sec. 5 states that “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings.”...the Senate has established rules that allow it to refuse to vote on a nominee...just as it can refuse to vote on bills, treaties, or any other business..."
washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-co…
"...Democrats held up George W. Bush’s nomination of Miguel Estrada...for over two years, until he was finally forced to withdraw without ever getting a vote of any kind. They did so because they had concerns about Estrada’s judicial philosophy..."

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-co…
By the way, we don't give a crap about Democratic Party Jesus.

We don't care if he's watching.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to 🇺🇸 doctorcherokee ❌
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!