Q-Haterz
LOGIC- Those who argue against #QAnon (usually) fall into two categories.
1. The 'journalists', don't like getting 'scooped' by citizen journalists or having their spin/fake stories independently investigated. They do NOT want you to question, they want you to trust.
LOGIC- Those who argue against #QAnon (usually) fall into two categories.
1. The 'journalists', don't like getting 'scooped' by citizen journalists or having their spin/fake stories independently investigated. They do NOT want you to question, they want you to trust.
2. People who did not 'buy-into' the #QAnon movement early. They did not believe it possible that Q was real then and therefore they are entrenched in their stances now. Kudos to those who use logic and have actually changed their position on Q later in the game.
What I also find interesting is that there are a LOT of people like me, that have studied EVERYTHING #QAnon related for the past <Year and when we are asked about it, there is NO DOUBT that what Q is sharing with us is legit intel and leads us down valid research holes.
So, why would so many people who admittedly have NOT studied a subject, argue so vehemently- claiming to KNOW more about the subject than the astute- against those who HAVE studied the subject? I'm not a doctor, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. 🤯💥👀
