,
11 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Luke Harding, who takes deepstate marching orders, just gave something away in trying to paint the false narrative the mueller team is trying paint. I'll explain.
First his latest fake-news piece, timely placed, its not what he says, but what he doesnt👇
theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
A month and a half ago, his own worthless rag, got ahead of its skis a bit and pubbed this beauty👇
google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
google.com/amp/s/amp.theg…
Now read lukes piece today again. It builds on all the scuttlebut in the earlier guardian story above, except there is one word you will not find in todays garbage:
Malloch
Malloch
Malloch is mentioned in todays stone subpeona. He's labeled a "trump supporter".
The SC goes out of his way not to draw much attention to him.
The SC goes out of his way not to draw much attention to him.
Remember Malloch getting detained and questioned at the boston airport with no lawyer, and he was supposed to testify b4 the grand jury 2 weeks later...but never did?
Thats because it was all staged. Malloch is stooge, mole, rat, informant whatever term you choose.
He was brought back from london because @chuckrossdc had outted Halper 2 days prior. Mueller needed to throw cover on another lure.
He was brought back from london because @chuckrossdc had outted Halper 2 days prior. Mueller needed to throw cover on another lure.
@ChuckRossDC So today, were to believe the Guardian posts an expose on Nigel Farrage, but makes not one mention of Malloch in the piece?
@ChuckRossDC Look at how malloch is described on the indictment:
Person 1's Associate who lived in the United Kingdom.
He doesn't get a label like person 3, he doesn't even mention he's a us citizen.
Person 1's Associate who lived in the United Kingdom.
He doesn't get a label like person 3, he doesn't even mention he's a us citizen.
@ChuckRossDC It be much simpler to just use "informant 1" wouldn't it?🤔
