,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
(1) Dershowitz has *no idea* what Mueller has found, and knows it.
(2) Dershowitz needs to read PROOF OF COLLUSION—as all the evidence of crimes he could want is in it. Trump lying to federal agents about Russia on August 17, 2016 at a classified briefing is somehow not criminal?
(2) Dershowitz needs to read PROOF OF COLLUSION—as all the evidence of crimes he could want is in it. Trump lying to federal agents about Russia on August 17, 2016 at a classified briefing is somehow not criminal?
(3) Trump conspiring with Cohen to offer Putin a $50 million penthouse in a yet-to-be-constructed Trump Tower Moscow after he was aware Russia was committing ongoing federal crimes is somehow not criminal? Dershowitz may be the least-informed lawyer in America on the Russia case.
(4) More broadly, *all* the Russians that Special Counsel Mueller indicted committed crimes before May 2017, and nearly all the Gates and Manafort crimes happened before May 2017, and Papadopoulos' crime occurred before May 2017—I mean what the *hell* is Dershowitz talking about?
(5) Imagine how little you *and* your audience have to know about the facts of the Trump-Russia case for you to say something like what @AlanDersh said. It's so counterfactual that it makes me ashamed to share a profession with Alan. Lawyers are supposed to be *better* than this.
(PS) And yes—to cut the dramatic irony off at the pass—I know we lawyers are often *not* better than this. But the Trump-Russia case has offered attorneys around the country a chance to *step up* and aid the country in understanding what's happening. Alan is doing the *opposite*.
