Thread by @Disciple_4G

******** Q-Thread 2/11 ********
Drop 2689
justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-…
"Although the specific conclusions within the joint report must remain classified, the Departments have concluded there is no evidence to date that any identified activities of a foreign government or....

.... foreign agent had a material impact on the integrity or security of election infrastructure or political/campaign infrastructure used in the 2018 midterm elections for the United States Congress." - FOREIGN interference. What about voter fraud? Observers in multiple pcts.

[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?- Exactly. Multiple reports already released, Texas being one of them, stating that almost 100K illegals registering/58K voting.

AAG Matthew Whitaker said in Congressional testimony last week that during the 2018 mid-term elections, 'there were multiple 'high risk' locations in which DHS had election observers in place.' Probably undercover.

In the classified version expect to see this: "In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that..... "

>Non-Cit votes by county- Actual votes cast
>Non-Cit promo by county- Door to door, ballot harvesting
>Non-Cit org by county- Community organizers like ACORN
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc- Census Q's
>Voter irregularities [internal]- % turnout vs registered

>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) >ballot pop >track for sign >submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)- Tests/traps. Data collected-ID soon.

Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?- They CHEAT
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?- Larger pool of "voters", black ops $$$
Find the connection.- Hot map shows
Sometimes a MAP helps.- YUP, visuals are good.

What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?- Crawford v. Marion County Election Board (Indiana-2008)
reuters.com/article/us-usa…

What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?- Minorities cannot afford/have access to a photo ID.
Racist?- WTFE
Voter suppression of minority vote?- FALSE
When is an ID required?- Drive, Buy vice goods, prescriptions, enter courts, etc.

Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?-
Who thinks having to have photo ID is racist?

Watch this video and you decide:

Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?- Yes & it pisses them off.
When is an ID required?-See above
Which minorities are they referring to? AA voters & illegal aliens (who they give ID now)

(illegal immigrants?)- Illegal ALIENS are the new primary target due to the black community being WOKE.
Logical thinking.- Logic is always useful- far too many are confounded by it.

If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?- Absolutely. PUBLIC OUTCRY- Every illegal vote nullifies a valid vote.

Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist? NO. That is why we need a NATIONAL voter ID law that cannot be skirted by the states.
newsobserver.com/news/politics-…

I think this is what Judge Thomas Schroeder was saying here: “In holding that the legislature did not enact the challenged provisions with discriminatory intent, the court seems to have missed the forest in carefully surveying the many trees,” the ruling states.

Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?- They should- Clean house
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite? Blackmailed

Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal? Not traditionally- BUT it took a left turn under Hussein's care in 2011.
baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/…
newsobserver.com/news/politics-…📁

Why do D's want POWER at all costs?- Saul Alinsky- "ends justify the means", Remember Andy Stern?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.

Drop 2690
Here are just SOME of the things in which you need a photo ID.

Drop 2691
If [AS] has seen 'evidence' of collusion and/or POTUS/RUSSIA illegal activities, as he's stated in the past many times across all D-arm media networks, why then is there a need to open 'new' investigations?- It's all a sham- PROJECTION- Defense- Keeping the base/sheeple

What about the so-called 'evidence' already seen?- ZERO production- all conjecture.
How is [AS] making open statements re: MUELLER not investigating POTUS/Deutsche Bank thorough enough if the MUELLER investigation itself is CLASSIFIED?- Leaky [AS] trying to deflect.

How does [AS] know what MUELLER has/hasn't investigated?- I don't think he does. I think he is just trying to justify HIS investigation- POTUS financial records tied to Duetsche bank.
FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN PLAY [COVER].- Exactly 100%

You are witnessing the greatest 'DISINFORMATION' campaign to ever be pushed by a political party.- Tavistock- YOU NEED TO KNOW HOW IT WORKS!
Ask yourself, why?- Desperation. They see the writing on the wall- PAIN is coming.

FEAR of what?- PAIN. This is Happening.
The message must be direct.- Us, Potus twitter, Chans- Direct to the public.
The WAR is very real.- Information war. Spiritual War. Get right with God and pray daily.

The Fear is that the truth will come out.
Desperate move to keep the truth from coming out is constant investigations.
Dual purpose- Keep POTUS negatively in the news/paint him as illegitimate and use the investigations as political cover against prosecution.

Drop 2692
judicialwatch.org/press-room/pre…
This needs a FINE TOOTH COMB.

Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to:
Then-Director James Comey; since fired;
Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director;
Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security;

Then-Assistant Director of Counter-intel E.W. Priestap, now retired;
James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey;
FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa;
Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring;
Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired;

Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson;
Strzok and Page
Does the list above look familiar?- YES, it is the same list of DOJ/FBI removed
Re_read drops re: FBI 'Midyear' OIG ……. & review graphics.- Drop 1807 has it all.

Drop 2693

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1095051195658522625

Let's actually use 'FACTS':
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).- Russia, Russia, Russia
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.- FISA+++

Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.

Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time!

Any way you slice it- I would not swap spots with 'Liddle' Adam Schiff right about now. Wonder what dirty act will be shown light first?

Is this [AS]?
It COULD be. Stay tuned!

From the JW link:
"On October 28, 2016, the day that Comey sent a letter to Congress regarding the FBI’s discovery that the Weiner laptop contained Clinton’s emails."
Remember that date- IMPORTANT.

"Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall, within hours, emails Baker requesting a call “ASAP” about the Comey letter...... I suggest that we have some kind of follow up meeting or phone call with this group either this evening or over the weekend ....

.... to address this and probably other issues/questions that come up in the next 24 hours. Sound reasonable?" Baker used 3 different time based words/phrases, in order to cite the urgency of the situation. 'This Evening, Over the weekend, & Next 24 hours'.

"The emails show that a conference call for the above senior officials was set up for the next day by Peter Strzok."

Then "(Two days before the election, on November 6, Comey sent a second letter reporting that the FBI’s review of the Weiner laptop material would not change his “conclusion” that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted.)"

"As Judicial Watch previously reported, there were at least 18 classified emails found on the Weiner laptop by the FBI. Paul Sperry’s RealClear Investigations report revealed that only 3,077 of 340,000 emails “were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information.”"

“It's big news that, just days before the presidential election, HRC’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents further underscore that the fix was in for HRC."

"The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan. (The court, in ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”)"

JW’s discovery will seek answers to:
* Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade (FOIA) by using a non-gov't email system
* Whether the DoS' efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith
* Whether the DoS adequately searched for FOIA records

https://twitter.com/Disciple_4G/status/1095111347128303622