,
6 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
So, it almost sounds like Jane Meyer and the New Yorker are hacks? -- I Stopped the Stormy Daniels Story at Fox News. Here’s Why. mediaite.com/online/i-stopp… via @mediaite
"The New Yorker piece couldn’t have been more successful for them. In a media world where criticizing Fox News is an industry staple, the piece was picked up by almost every major outlet and Jane Mayer was feted throughout journalism."
"My non-quote quote and wrong story appeared everywhere from cable news to Jimmy Kimmel to the news outlets that re-wrote the story, including The Wash Post ...and at least 70 others.
I say “re-wrote” instead of “reported” because not a single reporter reached out to me. None."
I say “re-wrote” instead of “reported” because not a single reporter reached out to me. None."
"The ultimate irony is that in its zeal to hang Fox News for journalistic malfeasance, the media tossed journalistic standards in the trash can and gave readers the 100% wrong impression of Fox and the Stormy Daniels story.”
At some point, we are going to accept that Jane Meyer can't be trusted.
I guess the journalistic community needs even more events like this before they accept that truth.
I guess the journalistic community needs even more events like this before they accept that truth.
And remember...this was the PRIMARY basis for Democrats to kick Fox News out of the debate running.
Don't tell me Democrats are fact based, when they depend on the word of hacks like Meyer for their excuses.
Don't tell me Democrats are fact based, when they depend on the word of hacks like Meyer for their excuses.
