, 3 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Reminds me of how the NYT editorial board the day after the ‘02 Venezuela coup justified their endorsement of it by saying Chavez killed protestors, then two weeks later—after Chavez had been reinstated—the NYT quietly reported the snipers who fired first were from the opposition
Like all war fervors the reporting on Venezuela has been hysterical and in sync w/ pro-US NatSec orthodoxy. Reporters largely see themselves as advocates for the opposition while everything the govt does is rounded up to the most ungenerous and cartoonishly evil reading of events
sources:
4/13/02 NYT Editorial, Chavez supporters killed 14 unarmed protestors.
nytimes.com/2002/04/13/opi…
4/29/02 follow up NYT report. Oops! We were wrong something something fog of war.
nytimes.com/2002/04/29/wor…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Adam H. Johnson
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!