And here is the start of a thread on my observations about the Barr letter: /1
We had a concerted effort at interference in the 2016 election by forces in the hostile Russian government. This is a point which is indisputable, but one which the President has rejected or only grudgingly and halfheartedly acknowledged. /3
Despite strong evidence of Russian interference in the election, Trump himself was found to have not been involved. His central claim of "no collusion" by him has proven correct, and it will feed into Trump's claims of deep state/media bias /4
Mueller found no coordination/cooperation among Trump team, despite what we know about the Trump Tower June 2016 meeting, raising some serious questions that only the full report can answer about why he so concluded: /5
Given Trump's rejection of claims of Russian interference, and a possible questionable legal interpretation of foreign interference and coordination, we have a lot to fear for 2020 elections /6
On the question of foreign interference, don't forget that Mueller declined to indict Roger Stone for violating campaign finance laws with his Wikileaks contacts, despite charging him with other crimes /7 slate.com/news-and-polit…
Ultimately, many Trump opponents were overly optimistic about the chances that campaign finance charges involving Don Jr., Manafort, Stone, and others would lead to Trump and bring down the Trump presidency, and this will have a backlash /8
Ultimately, on the campaign finance charges, SDNY proved much more aggressive in their campaign finance theories than Mueller ever was. It's possible Trump can/might already be indicted (sealed) for the Stormy Daniels hush money payments but... /9
and this now leads us to the obstruction charges.
First, Trump's claim of complete "exoneration" is wrong. Barr explains that Mueller punted, and expressly did not see exoneration. /11
Mueller's punt was irresponsible. He knew that Barr would be seen, fairly or not, as a Trump protector. And Rosenstein too was under tremendous pressure with earlier 25th amendment talk. Mueller was most insulated and we should have had his judgment /12
The only defense for Mueller's actions here is that the failure to decide all but guarantees political pressure to see the full report, and there Mueller might lay out a case that while sold as equivocal, damns Trump and opens door to impeachment /13
Trump's lawyers are gloating that they resisted Mueller taking Trump's oral testimony under oath. This sets a terrible precedent for the future for presidents accused of wrongdoing, Unclear why he did not have this fight. /14
Hard to see how this doesn't strengthen Trump politically, at least in the short run (until report issues). Headline is no collusion, no more indictments. Trump surrounded himself with criminals but he's not been shown here to be a criminal himself /15
This was only a partial victory for the rule of law. Yes Mueller was able to finish, but only after relentless (unnecessary) attacks on him, his staff, the FBI and others. Trump may be innocent but he's shown terrible authoritarian tendencies. 16/16