Thee is a huge national scandal here also:
Thread:
abc.net.au/news/2019-04-0… via @abcnews
This means the proponent refused to refer the project for assessment, despite it having significant impacts on matters of national importance.
The government then made a call to fast track the assessment (and approval) of the clearing, which appeared to be in response to political pressure - I'll come back to this...
smh.com.au/politics/feder…
abc.net.au/radionational/…
They won with @EDONSW.
smh.com.au/politics/feder…
Nonetheless, there will be sustained political pressure for it to be approved.
The proponent is well connected politically
Which is the story of Josh Frydenberg ignoring department advice to push through a development by a major political donor in critical habitat and a Ramsar wetland.
There are a lot more sitting in there also, but who's tracking them all? - there are hundreds of referrals every year.
It's why we need environmental standards and outcomes written into law.
It's why we need to give citizens greater powers to hold decision makers account in the courts and ensure transperancy.
We need leadership
But fighting every battle through FoI and a broken impact assessment system which favours developer interests is not going to fix the problem.
mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-0…