, 4 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Add to this the 3% growth target idea. The UK central bank mandate risks becoming a complete mess. 1. Obv monetary policy should not be used to target relative prices. This isn't what is being suggested here. But needs saying.
2. Macroprudential tools are for financial stability. Prices are indicative of risks, but for those purposes not ends in themselves. The cb can't be juggling relative price and financial stability objectives.
3. It could juggle them if those objectives were never in conflict. But if that was the case the price objective would be redudant!
4. Handing the cb the relative house price objective without other important levers - public housebuilding, planning, social housing subsidies, would be peverse. That would be an objective I would not accept responsibility for and I wonder who would.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Tony Yates
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!