, 11 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
ROAD MAP TO CONGRESS pg 220
@RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler
Under applicable Supreme Court precedent, the Constitution does not categorically and permanently immunize a President for obstructing justice through the use of his Article II powers.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those of courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President's ability to fulfill his constitutional mission.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
The term "corruptly " sets a demanding standard. It requires a concrete showing that a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else, inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
A preclusion of " corrupt" official action does not diminish the President ' s ability to exercise Article II powers.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
📌For example, the proper supervision of criminal law does not demand freedom for the President to act with a corrupt intention of shielding himself from criminal punishment, avoiding financial liability, or preventing personal embarrassment.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
📌To the contrary, a statute that prohibits official action undertaken for such corrupt purposes furthers, rather than hinders, the impartial and evenhanded administration of the law.
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
It also aligns with the President's constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws. Finally , we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President's conduct is justified,
doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties.

doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
‼️The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that NO PERSON IS ABOVE THE LAW.

doc-0c-70-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Karol 🌿
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!