,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Here’s one aspect of Barr’s March 24th letter that Mueller plainly contradicted but didn’t get much attention today. I’m told House Dems may zoom in on it. 
In at least a couple instances — the effort to have McGahn fire Mueller and the effort to enlist Lewandowski to pressure Sessions to end the Mueller probe — Mueller presented no mitigating alternative evidence.
In other words, there was no evidence on “both sides” of the question. Mueller laid out the three obstruction prongs and said substantial evidence showed Trump met each one. No innocuous theories offered.
As @qjurecic demonstrates, it's actually 8 instances in which Mueller says Trump met the all the criteria for an obstruction charge:
